2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-008-0359-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote video bioassays reveal the potential feeding impact of the rabbitfish Siganus canaliculatus (f: Siganidae) on an inner-shelf reef of the Great Barrier Reef

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
112
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
14
112
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the large seasonal build-ups of macroalgal biomass on the reef crest and reef flat remain largely unexploited. This is consistent with other studies (McClanahan et al 1999;Bellwood et al 2006;Ledlie et al 2007;Mantyka and Bellwood 2007;Fox and Bellwood 2008) that have reported the limited impact of scarids on well-established mature macroalgal stands.…”
Section: Seasonal Aspects Of Food Choicesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In particular, the large seasonal build-ups of macroalgal biomass on the reef crest and reef flat remain largely unexploited. This is consistent with other studies (McClanahan et al 1999;Bellwood et al 2006;Ledlie et al 2007;Mantyka and Bellwood 2007;Fox and Bellwood 2008) that have reported the limited impact of scarids on well-established mature macroalgal stands.…”
Section: Seasonal Aspects Of Food Choicesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…If Pioneer Bay is suffering from such extreme reductions in grazing and browsing, why have we not seen a shift to macroalgal dominance? Previous studies conducted in this location have revealed that reduced herbivory by fishes is the primary driver of phase-shifts to macroalgal dominance (Hughes et al 2007), and that browsing reef fishes are critical for recovery following macroalgal development (Bellwood et al 2006a, Fox and Bellwood 2008, Hoey and Bellwood 2011. The changes in grazing and browsing rates documented in this study seem to represent the ideal conditions for development of macroalgae in a system that has a history of this outcome.…”
Section: Subtle Signs Of Ecosystem Degradation: Browsers and Macroalgaementioning
confidence: 48%
“…This is particularly worrying when combined with severely reduced grazing, which offers less control over the development of macroalgae. In most previous studies, individual thalli of Sargassum have been grazed within a day of deployment (this study, Mantyka and Bellwood 2007, Fox and Bellwood 2008, Cvitanovic and Bellwood 2009, Lefèvre and Bellwood 2011, Hoey and Bellwood 2011 and even large deployments of the macroalga, which simulate phase-shifts, have largely been removed in four to five days (Bellwood et al 2006a, Hoey and. Although browsing has not faced the declines seen in grazing, even slight changes may affect the ability of the reef to prevent, and recover from, increasing macroalgal abundance Bellwood 2011, Graham et al 2013).…”
Section: Subtle Signs Of Ecosystem Degradation: Browsers and Macroalgaementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The monitoring by underwater video has been demonstrated as an effi cient and non-destructive tool for studying fi sh abundance and behaviour (Fox and Bellwood 2008, Layton and Fulton 2014, Noble et al 2014, Pink and Fulton 2015. Different video systems exist such as baited remote underwater video (BRUV) (Watson et al 2005, Cappo et al 2007, Lowry et al 2012, diver operated video (DOV) (Hall andHanlon 2002, Langlois et al 2010), cabled video observatories , and unbaited, remote underwater video (RUV) (Pelletier et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%