2016
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/63411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal Efficiency and the Mineralization Mechanism During Enhanced Bioventing Remediation of Oil-Contaminated Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further reaffirm the above-stated, Jia et al (2016) noted that the removal of crude oil in soils in the sets of treatments was caused by volatilization and biodegradation. Still, biodegradation was the most effective removal process, accounting for more than 58% of the total removal and reached the highest removal efficiency with nutrient adjustment, as reported by Jia et al (2016). The non-responsive nature of some hydrocarbons to biological degradation accounts for the low removal efficiency of this recalcitrant group of hydrocarbons, which occurs at difficult intervals in the same treatment environment, hence reducing the TPH removal efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To further reaffirm the above-stated, Jia et al (2016) noted that the removal of crude oil in soils in the sets of treatments was caused by volatilization and biodegradation. Still, biodegradation was the most effective removal process, accounting for more than 58% of the total removal and reached the highest removal efficiency with nutrient adjustment, as reported by Jia et al (2016). The non-responsive nature of some hydrocarbons to biological degradation accounts for the low removal efficiency of this recalcitrant group of hydrocarbons, which occurs at difficult intervals in the same treatment environment, hence reducing the TPH removal efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Also, volatilization was not considered in the process because the contaminant has less volatile components and considering low operating temperature and low flow intensities, these components have a negligible effect, according to the findings of Fingas (2004) and Ma et al (2014). To further reaffirm the above-stated, Jia et al (2016) noted that the removal of crude oil in soils in the sets of treatments was caused by volatilization and biodegradation. Still, biodegradation was the most effective removal process, accounting for more than 58% of the total removal and reached the highest removal efficiency with nutrient adjustment, as reported by Jia et al (2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the results of the current BVT study with 54.93% (BVT) and 65.41% (BVT and wastewater amendment) average TPH removal efficiencies correspond to the studies by [34] and [7] which reported 64.2% and 61.7% TPH removal efficiencies with bioventing after 12month and 28 days treatment period respectively while and appreciable removal efficiency of >75% was recorded with bioventing and organic amendment according to [7] after 28 days. Similarly, [13], [14] and [15] recorded >70% TPH removal with bioventing and nutrient amendment technique after 112, 210 and 120days treatment period accordingly while [35] and [36] reported an average of 60% and 65% TPH removal efficiencies with bioventing and nutrient supplement after 91 and 40-50days study period respectively. The study showed that wastewater can serve an effective organic stimulant while air-injection adequately provides an aerobic environment for appreciable TPH reduction and treatment of crude oil contaminated soils.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The soil permeability and humidity control the petroleum degradation by regulating vapour propagation, while the existence of air disturbance compounds disrupts the air injection fluency, and lastly, the oxygen availability regulates the aerobic biodegradation. These constraints can be overcome by adding nutrients and manipulating the soil moisture or applying ozonation [ 78 , 94 ]. Nutrients are essential energy for microbes to grow and degrade hydrocarbons, while ozonation is used to accelerate partial oxidation of recalcitrant pollutants into volatile vapours.…”
Section: Enhanced Bioremediation Studies In Cold Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%