2021
DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2021.1934675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of an emerging pharmaceutical pollutant, sulfasalazine, by adsorption onto pomegranate peels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the quantitative dye removal efficiency (% R e ) and dye adsorption capacity ( q e , mg g –1 ) of G3 were determined with the help of the calibration curves of EB (Figure S34A,B), and the values were found to be 95.8% and 66.7 mg g –1 , respectively, after 48 h of incubation, which is comparable to our recently reported hydrogels based on acrylamide/2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and the IL cross-linker and other dye adsorbents also. ,, In the case of SZ adsorption, the % R e and q e values after 48 h, as determined from the corresponding calibration curves (Figure S34C,D), were found to be 84.3 and 66.9 mg g –1 , respectively. These values are very close to those of other reported adsorbents or reagents utilized for the treatment of removal of SZ from wastewater. , Such kind of dye absorption was mostly caused by the Columbic interactions between the cationic cross-linkers present in the gel and negatively charged dye/drug molecules in solution …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, the quantitative dye removal efficiency (% R e ) and dye adsorption capacity ( q e , mg g –1 ) of G3 were determined with the help of the calibration curves of EB (Figure S34A,B), and the values were found to be 95.8% and 66.7 mg g –1 , respectively, after 48 h of incubation, which is comparable to our recently reported hydrogels based on acrylamide/2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and the IL cross-linker and other dye adsorbents also. ,, In the case of SZ adsorption, the % R e and q e values after 48 h, as determined from the corresponding calibration curves (Figure S34C,D), were found to be 84.3 and 66.9 mg g –1 , respectively. These values are very close to those of other reported adsorbents or reagents utilized for the treatment of removal of SZ from wastewater. , Such kind of dye absorption was mostly caused by the Columbic interactions between the cationic cross-linkers present in the gel and negatively charged dye/drug molecules in solution …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Ionic hydrogel-based materials are well-known for their potential applications in drugs/dyes-adsorption and wastewater treatment. , To explore such possibilities for this cationic G3 hydrogel, we examined its removal efficiency toward EB dye and SZ drug via UV–vis spectroscopy. The result showed that the absorbances at λ max,EB = 520 nm and λ max,SZ = 359 nm for EB and SZ, respectively, decreased drastically within 24 h, as could be seen clearly from the UV–vis spectra of the supernatant dye solutions before and after charging with G3 (Figure A,B).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study of Bouallegue et al [67], a biosorbent from pomegranate peels (PG) was produced for the removal of sulfasalazine (SSZ), a pharmaceutical used to treat diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease. According to the results, maximum removal (100%) was achieved at pH 4.8, with 50 mg/L as the initial concentration of SSZ and an adsorbent dose of 0.5 g/L within 60 min.…”
Section: Pharmaceuticals Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Despite their efficiency, these processes are limited in face of high toxicity and high levels of biorecalcitrant pollutants. Physical processes have been adopted for the removal of pharmaceutical pollutants including adsorption onto activated carbon, [8] metal oxide-based materials, [8] clay materials, [9] agroindustrial wastes, [9,10] biochar, [9] modified chitosan, [9,11] etc., and membrane processes such as reverse osmosis, [12] nanofiltration, and more. [13,14] However, these processes have the drawback of removing and transferring the pollutant from one phase to another, which involves a posttreatment step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%