2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of As(V) and As(III) by reclaimed iron-oxide coated sands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
43
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where C e corresponds to the residual concentration of As(III) ions in the solution at equilibrium (µg/ᐉ), K F and 1/n are characteristic constants that can be related to the relative adsorption capacity of the adsorbent and the intensity of adsorption, respectively, q m is a measure of monolayer adsorption capacity (µg/g) and K L is a constant related to the free energy of adsorption (Borah et al 2008(Borah et al , 2009Chutia et al 2009;Faghihian and Nejati-Yazdinejad 2009a,b;Gupta and Ghosh 2009;Kul and Caliskan 2009;Banerjee et al 2008;Hsu et al 2008;Partey et al 2008;So et al 2008;Jeong et al 2007;Ohe et al 2005;Thirunavukkarasu et al 2003). To assess the extent to which the kinetic and adsorption isotherms equations fit the experimental data, two different error functions were examined.…”
Section: Adsorption Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C e corresponds to the residual concentration of As(III) ions in the solution at equilibrium (µg/ᐉ), K F and 1/n are characteristic constants that can be related to the relative adsorption capacity of the adsorbent and the intensity of adsorption, respectively, q m is a measure of monolayer adsorption capacity (µg/g) and K L is a constant related to the free energy of adsorption (Borah et al 2008(Borah et al , 2009Chutia et al 2009;Faghihian and Nejati-Yazdinejad 2009a,b;Gupta and Ghosh 2009;Kul and Caliskan 2009;Banerjee et al 2008;Hsu et al 2008;Partey et al 2008;So et al 2008;Jeong et al 2007;Ohe et al 2005;Thirunavukkarasu et al 2003). To assess the extent to which the kinetic and adsorption isotherms equations fit the experimental data, two different error functions were examined.…”
Section: Adsorption Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 50 household treatment technologies exist worldwide for water pollution removal (24). Arsenic removal by low-cost adsorbents, such as filter based granulated adsorbents, has been the most promising technique, which meets all the mentioned criteria offering reliable and efficient performance for communities living in scattered settlements (8,25,27). However, natural adsorbents are favorable for their low-cost and abundant sources, yet, some studies have shown that they had no sufficient capacity to remove total arsenic (As (III) + As (V)) from water resources (28,29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many adsorbents have been reported in the literature for the removal of As(V) such as red mud (Genc-Fuhrman et al 2004), iron-modified bamboo charcoal (Liu et al 2012), mesoporous alumina (Han et al 2013), iron-coated rice husk (Pehlivan et al 2013), granular activated carbonbased iron-containing adsorbents (Gu et al 2005), magnesia or manganese-loaded fly ash cenospheres , iron-oxide-coated sand (Hsu et al 2008), natural and iron-modified zeolite (Baskan and Pala 2011), and clays (Wainipee et al 2013). However, the use of these adsorbents for the removal of As(V) has some limitations due to the disposable of spent media, technical difficulties for the preparation of these adsorbents, and removal of coexisting ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%