1984
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1984)110:1(110)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Cadmium (II) by Low Cost Adsorbents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
146
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 393 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
146
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate constants were determined by considering the linear portion of adsorption kinetics data as entire data range did not fall in a straight line. Similar trend was observed by other researchers while studying cadmium adsorption onto various low-cost adsorbents [9] and biosorbents. [10] Results show that the adsorption rate varied considerably with grain size of waste activated carbon employed.…”
Section: Kinetic Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The rate constants were determined by considering the linear portion of adsorption kinetics data as entire data range did not fall in a straight line. Similar trend was observed by other researchers while studying cadmium adsorption onto various low-cost adsorbents [9] and biosorbents. [10] Results show that the adsorption rate varied considerably with grain size of waste activated carbon employed.…”
Section: Kinetic Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A number of 250 ml bottles were filled with 100 ml of P solutions at four different P concentrations (5,15,30, and 60 mg L -1 ), and 1 g of the alum sludge was added to each bottle. The mixture was then agitated at 200 rpm on the rotary shaker.…”
Section: Kinetics Of P-adsorption By the Alum Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those include bacteria [1], yeasts [2], bark [3], fungi [4], agricultural by-products [5], coconut shell [6], marine algae [7], moss peat [8] and aquatic mosses [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%