2015
DOI: 10.12989/aer.2015.4.2.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Cu (II) from aqueous solutions using magnetite: A kinetic, equilibrium study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alorro et al [24] showed that gold ions adsorbed on magnetite due to higher standard reduction potential of Au than the open circuit potential (OCP) of magnetite, and also observed that small amount of Cu adsorbed even though the standard reduction potential of Cu is lower than OCP of magnetite. Since the standard reduction potential of gold cyanide complex ions decreased to −0.3 V versus SHE from 1.1 V versus SHE in chloride solution [26][27][28], it was expected that the remaining cyanide ions would prevent Au adsorption on the magnetite, whereas a few amounts of copper ions could be adsorbed due to the pH and difference of solution media [29][30][31][32]. The remaining copper ions can have a detrimental effect on the purity of gold in an electrowinning process of gold [33].…”
Section: Results Presented Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alorro et al [24] showed that gold ions adsorbed on magnetite due to higher standard reduction potential of Au than the open circuit potential (OCP) of magnetite, and also observed that small amount of Cu adsorbed even though the standard reduction potential of Cu is lower than OCP of magnetite. Since the standard reduction potential of gold cyanide complex ions decreased to −0.3 V versus SHE from 1.1 V versus SHE in chloride solution [26][27][28], it was expected that the remaining cyanide ions would prevent Au adsorption on the magnetite, whereas a few amounts of copper ions could be adsorbed due to the pH and difference of solution media [29][30][31][32]. The remaining copper ions can have a detrimental effect on the purity of gold in an electrowinning process of gold [33].…”
Section: Results Presented Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,7,8,25,27−31 Magnetic properties allow for easy and efficient collection, reducing chemicals needed for removal and decreasing the production of secondary pollutants. 26,34,35 Additionally, Fe 3 O 4 can effectively capture anions and cations across a range of pH values. 13,26,27,32,33 Further, Fe 3 O 4 has demonstrated potential in applications such as magnetic inks, MRI contrast agents, and water treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers are currently exploring various methods to address contaminant removal, including ion exchange, biochar, reverse osmosis, adsorption, and a selective capacitive removal technology employing electro-adsorption or capacitive deionization. ,,,,, This work examined the adsorption method, using magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) particles as the adsorbent. Adsorption is efficient, simple, and produces less byproducts than methods such as membrane filtration, ion exchange, and chemical precipitation. ,,, Fe 3 O 4 is inexpensive, already exists in the environment, and has several favorable characteristics including biocompatibility, magnetic susceptibility, and an easily modified surface. ,,,, Magnetic properties allow for easy and efficient collection, reducing chemicals needed for removal and decreasing the production of secondary pollutants. ,, Additionally, Fe 3 O 4 can effectively capture anions and cations across a range of pH values. ,,,, Further, Fe 3 O 4 has demonstrated potential in applications such as magnetic inks, MRI contrast agents, and water treatment. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cu ions is among those hazardous metal that are most commonly found in industrial wastewater. Even at a very small amount, Cu ions can cause severe physiological or neurological damage [1,2]. It was previously reported that a permissible level of Cu in water is 2 mg/L (milligram/ liter).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%