Water Treatment for Purification From Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781118928677.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins by Conventional Physical‐chemical Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The removal of cyanobacteria biomass is commonly achieved by sedimentation or dissolved air flotation (DAF), with the latter being found more effective because the floating capacity of aggregated colonies and cells improves that process [ 194 ]. In DAF, fine air micro-bubbles are introduced to the liquid phase.…”
Section: Drinking/potable Water Treatment—removal Of Cyanobacteria and Their Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The removal of cyanobacteria biomass is commonly achieved by sedimentation or dissolved air flotation (DAF), with the latter being found more effective because the floating capacity of aggregated colonies and cells improves that process [ 194 ]. In DAF, fine air micro-bubbles are introduced to the liquid phase.…”
Section: Drinking/potable Water Treatment—removal Of Cyanobacteria and Their Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An efficient DAF process requires particle coagulation that destabilizes them by neutralizing their negative charge and changes their hydrophilicity [ 195 , 196 ]. The concentrated cyanobacterial biomass in the form of dense sludge needs special attention because cell lysis is accompanied by the release of intracellular toxins prior and during sludge storage and treatment [ 194 ]. Therefore, the disposal of sludge containing cyanotoxins must confirm the absence of residual toxicity and comply with regional legislation concerning toxic wastes.…”
Section: Drinking/potable Water Treatment—removal Of Cyanobacteria and Their Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, cyanotoxins have been the subject of many studies, because they are soluble in water and pass through the conventional system that use common treatment adsorbents and, therefore, this type of treatment is unlikely to provide an efficient elimination of cyanotoxins. It is commonly understood that in most species, most toxins remain within healthy cells and are only released in lysis, which can be a consequence of natural senescence, changes in environmental conditions or during corrective practices, such as the use of algaecide in the process treatment (Teixeira, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Cyanotoxins and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very often, these steps are cross-linked and supplied by processes such as sedimentation and flocculation. Physical removal includes the adsorption by effective sorbents (usually activated carbon) and the application of several filtration techniques [47,48]. Conventional sand filtration may be sufficient, but could also enhance the release of high concentrations of MCs into treated water [49,50].…”
Section: Conventional Strategies Of Microcystin Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%