1996
DOI: 10.1080/01496399608001033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Direct Red from Aqueous Solution by Foam Separation Techniques of Ion and Adsorbing Colloid Flotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this were: firstly, direct dyes anions were protonated, which made the formation of dye-surfactant aggregate difficult [27]; secondly, lower pH induced the decrease of foam quantity and foam stability due to decreased surface tension and viscosity of the solution. We also observed lower color removal in alkaline conditions which agreed with Choi and Choi [18]. It was thought that the presence of excessive OH − competed with the direct dye anions for CTAB.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons for this were: firstly, direct dyes anions were protonated, which made the formation of dye-surfactant aggregate difficult [27]; secondly, lower pH induced the decrease of foam quantity and foam stability due to decreased surface tension and viscosity of the solution. We also observed lower color removal in alkaline conditions which agreed with Choi and Choi [18]. It was thought that the presence of excessive OH − competed with the direct dye anions for CTAB.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Kabil and Ghazy [17] be floated. Choi and Choi [18] studied the removal of Direct Red from aqueous solutions by using foam separation techniques of ion and adsorbing colloid flotation. Horng and Huang [19] investigated foam separation of Direct Blue 1 from simulated wastewater; over 98% of Direct Blue 1 was removed in 5 min.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, foam separation is being considered as a promising separation technique to separate surface-active materials based on the differences in their surface activity. Several reports described it as an effective and low-cost wastewater treatment method for the removal of dyes, proteins, organic materials, metal ions and even materials that are not surface-active. Foam is usually generated by bubbling gas, in most cases air, through the aqueous wastewater and can be easily separated from the top of the solution . A surfactant, commonly known as collector, is used to make the foam stable when aerated as well as to promote the formation of dye–surfactant complexes by electrostatic interaction.…”
Section: Dye–surfactant Interactions: Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first used in ore processing, and has been pointed out to be a promising technique for oily wastewater treatment [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The froth flotation process is suitable for treating wastewater containing suspended solids as well as oils, in both emulsion and dissolved forms, because of several advantages, including rapid operation, low space requirements for equipment set-up, high removal efficiency, flexibility of the application to various pollutants at varying scales, and a low operating cost [13]. In a froth flotation operation, oily wastewater and a surfactant solution with a proper concentration are continuously fed to a froth flotation column, and air is introduced into the system in order to generate fine bubbles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%