2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01571-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa using flow cytometry and sorting does not improve the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The oxidative attack on sperm DNA can lead to the formation of oxidised bases, making the DNA strand prone to fragmentation. These spermatozoa are essentially cryptic in terms of SDF detection, waiting 'under the surface', ultimately to be detected, depending on the degree of damage imposed, for instance, by ex-vivo manipulation or iatrogenic damage before use in ART.Indeed, it has been shown that the decrease in SDF rates seen after the use of sperm selection techniques for ART does not necessarily translate to improvements in pregnancy rates(De Geyter et al, 2019;Gosálvez et al, 2013). Moreover, a few double-strand DNA breaks are sufficient to delay cell cycle progression(van den Berg et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oxidative attack on sperm DNA can lead to the formation of oxidised bases, making the DNA strand prone to fragmentation. These spermatozoa are essentially cryptic in terms of SDF detection, waiting 'under the surface', ultimately to be detected, depending on the degree of damage imposed, for instance, by ex-vivo manipulation or iatrogenic damage before use in ART.Indeed, it has been shown that the decrease in SDF rates seen after the use of sperm selection techniques for ART does not necessarily translate to improvements in pregnancy rates(De Geyter et al, 2019;Gosálvez et al, 2013). Moreover, a few double-strand DNA breaks are sufficient to delay cell cycle progression(van den Berg et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, FACS sorting procedure of spermatozoa was mainly used for sex sorting. However, a few recent studies (Ribeiro et al, 2013;De Geyter et al, 2019) showed that using a YO-PRO-1 staining and FACS sorting the proportion of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa in human semen samples can be reduced to 5% as a result of apoptotic cell removal. In general, fragmentation of nuclear DNA is one of the main features of apoptosis (Ribeiro et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reproductive outcomes regarding this method are unknown. As an alternative to MACS, FACS sorting of YO-PRO-1 positive cells were recently used to remove apoptotic cells and thus reduced the number of DNAfragmented spermatozoa in order to improve the outcomes in assisted reproduction (Ribeiro et al, 2013;De Geyter et al, 2019). Thus, beside the sperm sexing FACS sorting might be used also to improve semen quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperm negatively selected via Annexin-V FACS have been shown to possess intact chromatin [ 107 ]. Additionally, in a human clinical trial, spermatozoa from the population that did not bind Annexin-V during FACS were used for ICSI resulted in improved pregnancy and live birth rates, as well as reduced miscarriage rates over embryos generated with sperm selected from SU [ 112 ].…”
Section: Sorting Semen: Significance and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%