2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10450-006-0143-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of heat of adsorption from adsorbent by forced convection

Abstract: An analytical mathematical model is used to investigate the effectiveness of forced convection for removal of the heat of adsorption from an adsorbent mass undergoing a differential adsorption process in a flow system. An example of such a process is measurement of gas adsorption kinetics using a differential adsorption bed. Isothermal operation may not be achieved even when a high gas flow rate is used, particularly if the sorption kinetics is relatively fast. Very small changes in the adsorbent temperature c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). 28,29,33,34 The LDF model, first proposed by Gleuckauf and Coates, assumes the adsorption rate to be directly proportional to the difference between the adsorbed concentration in equilibrium with the gas phase 𝜕𝜕 * (g/g) and the current average amount adsorbed q (mol/mÂł).…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). 28,29,33,34 The LDF model, first proposed by Gleuckauf and Coates, assumes the adsorption rate to be directly proportional to the difference between the adsorbed concentration in equilibrium with the gas phase 𝜕𝜕 * (g/g) and the current average amount adsorbed q (mol/mÂł).…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption amount q (mol/m 3 ) is calculated by the LDF model for adsorption applications (eq ). ,,, The LDF model, first proposed by Glueckauf and Coates, assumes the adsorption rate to be directly proportional to the difference between the adsorbed concentration in equilibrium with the gas phase q * (g/g) and the current average amount adsorbed q (mol/m 3 ). All mass-transfer phenomena of the particle are lumped into a single mass-transfer coefficient k (s –1 ). ,,,,− The molar mass of water is presented by M w,H 2 O . …”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 It is also shown that flow of gas over the adsorbent at a moderate to high rate for removing (or supplying) the heat of ad(de)sorption during the kinetic test may not achieve a true isothermal process when the kinetics of sorption is relatively fast. 24,25 d. Random Nature of Data Generation. Many of the traditional methods for measurement of multicomponent equilibrium adsorption data do not have control over the final equilibrium state at the end of the test.…”
Section: Traditional Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow rate of the gas mixture flowing to the column was set to a high rate (∌350 mL/min) to keep temperature changes due to the adsorption heat effects negligible. According to Sircar, 25 although the flow of feed gas facilitates heat removal from adsorbents, small temperature increases are expected even at high flow rates.…”
Section: Equilibrium Isotherm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow rate of the gas mixture flowing to the column was set to a high rate (∌350 mL/min) to keep temperature changes due to the adsorption heat effects negligible. According to Sircar, although the flow of feed gas facilitates heat removal from adsorbents, small temperature increases are expected even at high flow rates. While negligible temperature changes of adsorbent result in considerable changes of the adsorption kinetic rate constants, in this study, small temperature effects on the adsorption equilibria, e.g., uptake amounts, were considered negligible.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%