2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11188604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Heavy Metals (Cd2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Pb2+) from Aqueous Solution Using Hizikia fusiformis as an Algae-Based Bioadsorbent

Abstract: This study investigated the applicability of algae (Hizikia fusiformis, Green gracilaria, and Codium fragile) for removing heavy metals (Cd2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, and Pb2+) from aqueous solutions. Among the algae, H. fusiformis was chosen as a bioadsorbent and modified with NaOH and HCl. The results showed that the biosorption capacity of H. fusiformis improved significantly after treatment with NaOH; however, H. fusiformis modified with HCl did not achieve the expected value. The NaOH treatment enhanced the biosorpti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further comparison of adsorption capacity with other classes of adsorbent was carried out as follows: The present results of SF:SS (4:1) show better CV adsorption capacity of 83.31 mg•g −1 (according to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm) compared to the biochar derived from palm-kernel shell [55]. For Cu 2+ adsorption, the SF:SS biocomposite adsorbent exhibits better adsorption capacity, of up to 73.22 mg•g −1 , than that of algae-based bioadsorbent, which showed an adsorption capacity of 42.25 mg•g −1 [56]. This maximum Cu 2+ adsorption capacity is, however, comparably lower than that of diethylenetriaminemodified polyacrilonitrile (DETA-PAN) fibers, which shows a maximum Cu 2+ adsorption capacity up to 112.3 mg•g −1 [57].…”
Section: Pollutantmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A further comparison of adsorption capacity with other classes of adsorbent was carried out as follows: The present results of SF:SS (4:1) show better CV adsorption capacity of 83.31 mg•g −1 (according to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm) compared to the biochar derived from palm-kernel shell [55]. For Cu 2+ adsorption, the SF:SS biocomposite adsorbent exhibits better adsorption capacity, of up to 73.22 mg•g −1 , than that of algae-based bioadsorbent, which showed an adsorption capacity of 42.25 mg•g −1 [56]. This maximum Cu 2+ adsorption capacity is, however, comparably lower than that of diethylenetriaminemodified polyacrilonitrile (DETA-PAN) fibers, which shows a maximum Cu 2+ adsorption capacity up to 112.3 mg•g −1 [57].…”
Section: Pollutantmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Among these groups, different aquatic plants species, such as Spirodela intermedia, Myriophyllum aquaticum, Mentha aquatic, Ludwigina palustris have been extensively used for the removal of heavy metals and radioactive compounds from wastewater [21]. Additionally, different aquatic weeds, like Lemna minor and other water hyacinths like Pontederia crassipes, Pistia stratiotespito, water spinach Ipomoea aquatic, and water lettuce are also proficient in accumulating the carcinogenic and mutagenic contaminants from wastewater [18,22]. Thus, aquatic micro-and macrophytes possesses the potential to sequestrate carbon from atmosphere offering simultaneous holistic treatment to the wastewater.…”
Section: Diversity and Robustness Of Algae Phytoplankton And Other Aq...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Pham et al [22] cultured three types of marine algae namely, Hizikia fusiformis, Green gracilaria, and Codium fragile for the removal of carcinogenic heavy metals such as Cu 2+ , Ni 2+ , Cd 2+ , and Pb 2+ from synthetic wastewater. However, green algae H. fusiformis was selected as superior candidate among other algae due to its better heavy metal bio-adsorbing capacity.…”
Section: Removal Of Heavy Metals Through Algae and Cyanobacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations