1992
DOI: 10.1080/09593339209385155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of heavy metals from sewage by sulphide precipitation: Thermodynamic calculations and tests on a pilot‐scale anaerobic reactor

Abstract: Theoretical and experimental studies have been undertaken to assess the-potential value of sulphide precipitation for removing heavy metals from sewage. The behaviour of cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, zinc and mercury has been examined. Thermodynamic calculations predict that metal sulphides are likely to precipitate in an upward flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor, and that the equilibrium solubilities will be very low. The experimental investigation was carried out on a pilot-scale UASB re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an operating system of artificial meanders the main reported route for removal of metals from the water column was by biosorption on detritus and algae [23]but it is also likely that sulfate‐reducing activity in the sediment will have contributed to mineralization of the sedimented metals. Sulfide precipitation also occurs during anaerobic digestion in the presence of sulfate where metal‐removal is a useful by‐product of organic waste treatment [24].…”
Section: Metal Precipitation By Sulfate‐reducing Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an operating system of artificial meanders the main reported route for removal of metals from the water column was by biosorption on detritus and algae [23]but it is also likely that sulfate‐reducing activity in the sediment will have contributed to mineralization of the sedimented metals. Sulfide precipitation also occurs during anaerobic digestion in the presence of sulfate where metal‐removal is a useful by‐product of organic waste treatment [24].…”
Section: Metal Precipitation By Sulfate‐reducing Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aerobic treatment, heavy metals partition fairly equally between effluent and sludge (Karvelas et al, 2003). In anaerobic treatment, heavy metal precipitation to the sludge is generally higher due to sulfide precipitation (Cowling et al, 1992;De la Varga et al, 2013). The partitioning behavior of organic pollutants depends on the compound, with a tendency towards sorbing to the sludge (Katsoyiannis & Samara, 2005).…”
Section: Biological Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, about 24.6% of S was adsorbed by soil and reached the maximum at 45-60 cm soil layer, after consecutive application of S-containing fertilizer over 6 years (Saha et al, 2001). Furthermore, Cowling et al (1992) reported that the reoxidation of metal sulfides will produce hydrogen ions, which would induce soil acidification. Gradually, the long-term application of S-containing fertilizer will cause avail-S to accumulate in soil and lead to more severe soil acidification.…”
Section: Application Of Cl-containing Fertilizer On Citrus Is Feasible Under the Premise Of Rainfall Higher Than Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 99%