2019
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.23568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of heavy metals in a flow‐through vertical microbial electrolysis cell

Abstract: This work describes laboratory experiments aimed at evaluating the feasibility of removing heavy metals from metal-contaminated water in flowthrough microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) with peat moss as a source of organic carbon. MECs were assembled in upflow glass columns containing granular activated carbon (GAC) bioelectrodes preceded by a layer of peat moss. The MECs were fed with metal-contaminated surface water collected at a firing range. At hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 4-6 days, up to 99 % remov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow‐through microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) were evaluated for the removal of heavy metals with peat moss as a carbon source in a laboratory study (Jugnia, Manno, Hendry, & Tartakovsky, 2019). High metal removal (>99% for Pb, Zn, Cu, and Fe) was obtained at hydraulic retention times of 4–6 days, representing a low‐cost passive treatment system.…”
Section: Mine Drainage Remediation Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow‐through microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) were evaluated for the removal of heavy metals with peat moss as a carbon source in a laboratory study (Jugnia, Manno, Hendry, & Tartakovsky, 2019). High metal removal (>99% for Pb, Zn, Cu, and Fe) was obtained at hydraulic retention times of 4–6 days, representing a low‐cost passive treatment system.…”
Section: Mine Drainage Remediation Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the comprehensive sewage discharge standard GB 8978 − 1996 stipulates that the maximum acceptable emission concentration of Cu 2+ is 0.5 mg/L. The treatment methods for heavy metals in wastewater include: chemical method [6], adsorption [7,8], electro-dialysis [9,10], ion exchange method [7,11], photocatalysis methods [12,13], and etc. With the adsorption method's advantages such as economic, simple and easy to operate, and wide scope of application, the research and development of green adsorption materials with good performance and speci c selectivity is becoming an important trend of controlling heavy metal pollution and recycling of resources [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] BESs of different designs and types of operation, including microbial fuel cells (MFCs), microbial electrolysis cells (MECs), [3,4] microbial desalination cells (MDCs), [5] and microbial reverse electrodialysis cell (MRCs) [6] have been successfully developed for multiple applications, including the direct harvesting of electrical energy from a variety of environmental wastes [7] and the removal of different types of pollutants. [8,9] Over the past decade, researchers have explored the factors affecting BESs, accumulating valuable data for optimizing the performance of BESs. A variety of factors, including system structure, electrode materials, operating conditions, and electrode biofilm growth state, have an impact on the performance of microbial electrochemical systems such as power output and pollutant removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%