2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of human enteric viruses by a full-scale membrane bioreactor during municipal wastewater processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
77
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Under optimal conditions, as detailed in Section 6, MBR systems can also reliably remove various viruses and phages. For example, Kuo et al [36] reported 4.1-5.6 log removals for human adenoviruses, whereas Simmons et al [45] reported that removal efficiencies could reach 6.3, 6.8, and 4.8 logs for human adenoviruses, enteroviruses, and noroviruses, respectively. Cicek et al [46], in their investigation into the use of an MBR to reclaim wastewater, studied the efficiency of an inorganic Al2O3-TiO2 ceramic membrane for the treatment of a synthetic wastewater [46].…”
Section: Overview Of Pathogen Removal By Membrane Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under optimal conditions, as detailed in Section 6, MBR systems can also reliably remove various viruses and phages. For example, Kuo et al [36] reported 4.1-5.6 log removals for human adenoviruses, whereas Simmons et al [45] reported that removal efficiencies could reach 6.3, 6.8, and 4.8 logs for human adenoviruses, enteroviruses, and noroviruses, respectively. Cicek et al [46], in their investigation into the use of an MBR to reclaim wastewater, studied the efficiency of an inorganic Al2O3-TiO2 ceramic membrane for the treatment of a synthetic wastewater [46].…”
Section: Overview Of Pathogen Removal By Membrane Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bacterial indicators were more efficiently removed than coliphages, which were more efficiently removed than enterovirus and norovirus genomes. Similarly, while looking at the removal of human enteric viruses from a full scale MBR plant, Simmons et al [45] found that compared to human adenovirus (5.5 log removal), human enterovirus (5.1 log removal) and norovirus (3.9 log removal) were removed with lower efficiencies. In a study by Hirani et al [51] the log removal of total and faecal coliform varied from 5.8 to 6.9 and 5.5 to 6.0, respectively, showing some impact of the indicator organism chosen on the perceived bacteria removal efficiency.…”
Section: Case-specific Suitability Of Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, MBR technology has emerged as an alternative to conventional activated sludge treatment (van Nieuwenhuijzen et al, 2008). In part this is because activated sludge effluents have been shown to contain levels of enteric organisms that may pose an unacceptable hazard to human health, particularly when indirect or even direct reuse (for potable or non-potable uses) is proposed (Koivunen and Heinonen-Tanski, 2005;Simmons and Xagoraraki, 2011;Zhang and Farahbakhsh, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enteroviruses are resilient organisms, able to survive drastic changes in temperature and pH [6,38]. Enteroviruses have been detected in both raw and treated sewages [5,[39][40][41][42][43][44]. Studies on removal efficiencies at wastewater treatment plants, based on real-time PCR, showed that enteroviruses are more resistant to treatment than other enteric viruses (adenoviruses and noroviruses) [5].…”
Section: Enterovirusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on removal efficiencies at wastewater treatment plants, based on real-time PCR, showed that enteroviruses are more resistant to treatment than other enteric viruses (adenoviruses and noroviruses) [5]. Moreover, live virions have been detect-HeAltH rIsks from wAter AnD new cHAllenges for tHe future ed in treated waters through infectivity assays, pointing to potential public health risks [5,40]. The occurrence of enteroviruses in coastal waters in both bathing and non-bathing sites is documented worldwide [45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Enterovirusmentioning
confidence: 99%