2023
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1127886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of inferior vena cava filter by open surgery after failure of endovenous retrieval

Abstract: BackgroundThe permanent placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters may lead to numerous complications and their removal is recommended once the risk of pulmonary embolism is reduced. Removal of IVC filters by endovenous means is preferred. But failure of endovenous removal happens when recycling hooks penetrate the vein wall and filters are left in place for too long time. In these scenarios, open surgery may be effective for removal of IVC filters. We aimed to describe the surgical approach, outcomes, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, endovascular surgery is preferred to remove IVCFs. However, open surgery is essential when filter removal is failed due to serious complications and can't be treated via endoluminal approach ( 10 ). Filter tilt is defined as an angulation of more than 15 degrees from the filter's long axis, which occurs in 3%–9% cases ( 11 ), resulting in hook attached to the vessel wall with proliferative tissue wrapping, failure to capture, thus increased damage of the hook or strut perforation to the vascular wall and adjacent tissues, and at last failure to retrieve the filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, endovascular surgery is preferred to remove IVCFs. However, open surgery is essential when filter removal is failed due to serious complications and can't be treated via endoluminal approach ( 10 ). Filter tilt is defined as an angulation of more than 15 degrees from the filter's long axis, which occurs in 3%–9% cases ( 11 ), resulting in hook attached to the vessel wall with proliferative tissue wrapping, failure to capture, thus increased damage of the hook or strut perforation to the vascular wall and adjacent tissues, and at last failure to retrieve the filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%