2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solution using reduced graphene oxide as an adsorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the adsorption capacities of the activated carbon samples studied are higher than those for chitosan–montmorillonite/polyaniline nanocomposite [ 34 ] and commercial activated carbon CWZ-22, but lower than for NORIT SX2 [ 35 ]. The adsorption capacities towards malachite green exceeded those for the composites of cellulose nanofiber and silver nanoparticles [ 36 ], reduced graphene oxide [ 37 ], and carbon obtained from date stones [ 38 ]. It should be also mentioned that the costs of adsorbents described in [ 36 , 37 , 38 ] are by far higher than those of obtaining activated carbons from marigold flowers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the adsorption capacities of the activated carbon samples studied are higher than those for chitosan–montmorillonite/polyaniline nanocomposite [ 34 ] and commercial activated carbon CWZ-22, but lower than for NORIT SX2 [ 35 ]. The adsorption capacities towards malachite green exceeded those for the composites of cellulose nanofiber and silver nanoparticles [ 36 ], reduced graphene oxide [ 37 ], and carbon obtained from date stones [ 38 ]. It should be also mentioned that the costs of adsorbents described in [ 36 , 37 , 38 ] are by far higher than those of obtaining activated carbons from marigold flowers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption capacities towards malachite green exceeded those for the composites of cellulose nanofiber and silver nanoparticles [ 36 ], reduced graphene oxide [ 37 ], and carbon obtained from date stones [ 38 ]. It should be also mentioned that the costs of adsorbents described in [ 36 , 37 , 38 ] are by far higher than those of obtaining activated carbons from marigold flowers. The carbon samples obtained by us showed much lower adsorption capacities towards crystal violet than the adsorbents obtained from agricultural rice bran waste [ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is observed from Figure 1a that in GO, the sheets are stuck together because of the oxygen‐containing functional groups, randomly aggregated, rough surface, heterogeneous surface structure, wrinkles are present, and the sheets are thin. [ 31 ] The FESEM image of RGO (Figure 1b) shows the wrinkled paper‐like structure, corrugated surface, less aggregate, and irregular structure. [ 32 ] These changes in surface morphology occur in RGO is due to the elimination of oxygenated functional groups from the RGO surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is expected that on the surface of rGO, there are eventually hydroxyl and epoxide groups, with only a partial reduction of GO. However, the main differences between GO and rGO are the predominance of carboxyl’s, many defects, and lower oxygen content in the reduced form [ 63 ]. Recently, Ansari and Siddiqui [ 64 ] have used Ficus carica , to promote the deoxygenation of graphene oxide with good results (Fig.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%