Removal of micropollutants through a biological wastewater treatment plant in a subtropical climate, Queensland-Australia

Abstract

BackgroundMunicipal wastewaters contain a multitude of organic compounds derived from domestic and industrial sources including active components of pharmaceutical and personal care products and compounds used in agriculture, such as pesticides, or food processing such as artificial sweeteners often referred to as micropollutants. Some of these compounds or their degradation products may have detrimental effects on the environment, wildlife and humans. Acesuflame is one of the most popular artificial sweeteners to date used in foodstuffs. The main objectives of this descriptive study were to evaluate the presence of micropollutants in both the influent and effluent of a large-scale conventional biological wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in South-East Queensland receiving wastewater from households, hospitals and various industries.MethodsBased on USEPA Method 1694: Filtered samples were spiked with mass-labelled chemical standards and then analysed for the micropollutants using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.ResultsThe presence of thirty-eight compounds were detected in the wastewater influent to the treatment plant while nine of the compounds in the categories of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, alkaloid and lipid/cholesterol lowering drugs were undetectable (100 % removed) in the effluent. They were: Analgesic: Paracetamol, Salicylic acid, Oxycodone; Anti-inflammatory: Naproxen + ve, Atorvastatin, Indomethacin, Naproxen; Alkaloid: Caffeine; Lipid/cholesterol lowering: Gemfibrozol.ConclusionsThe study results revealed that the micropollutants removal through this biological treatment process was similar to previous research reported from other countries including Europe the Americas and Asia, except for acesulfame, a highly persistent artificial sweetener. Surprisingly, acesulfame was diminished to a much greater extent (>90 %) than previously reported research for this type of WWTPs (45–65 %) that only include physical removal of objects and solids and a biodegradation step.

Evaluation of surfactant removal efficiency in selected domestic wastewater treatment plants in Poland

“…According to regulation [1], the maximum permissible COD value for domestic or municipal sewage introduced into the aquatic or terrestrial environment is 150 mg O 2 /L. For BOD 5 , these values are 25 mgO 2 /L or minimal pollutant reduction 70-90% for purified wastewater introduced into the aquatic environmental or at least 20% if it is introduced into the ground [1]. The reduction of BOD 5 and COD above 90% was obtained as a result of purification in sewage treatment plants of the ORS and SBR-K-6 type.…”

“…In case of residential wastewater treatment plants (RWTPs) which work with the use of the classic activated sludge, their proper operation is negatively affected by shifts in the pollutant load and wastewater volume as well as changing environmental conditions. The highest threat for such systems is associated with the presence of surface active compounds (surfactants) [3][4][5][6][7]. In 2010 the production of surface active agents in Poland reached 81 thousand tons.…”

Application of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles immobilized on clay in wastewater treatment: a review

“…Different methods have been developed and used for the treatment of wastewater. Some of the adopted techniques are centrifugation (Peeters 2015), filtration (Cardenas et al 2016), flotation (de Oliveira da Mota et al 2015), evaporation (Li et al 2016), distillation (Ji 2018), ion exchange (Tan et al 2017), precipitation (Sun et al 2017), electrolysis (Huang et al 2016), electrodialysis (Akhter et al 2018), adsorption (Guillaume et al 2018;You et al 2019), crystallization (Lu et al 2017), micro and ultra-filtration (Pinto et al 2017), sedimentation and gravity separation, reverse osmosis (Venzke et al 2017), and coagulation (Mousa and Hadi 2016). However, these prevailing technologies have some setbacks such as being time-consuming and costly and leading to the generation of toxic sludge.…”

Sated by a Zero-Calorie Sweetener: Wastewater Bacteria Can Feed on Acesulfame

“…Falas et al (2016) reported ACE removal of up to 80% in bench-scale reactors with activated sludge from municipal wastewater. Cardenas et al (2016) measured ACE removal of >90% in a WWTP in Queensland (Australia).…”