Removal of Ni(II) and Zn(II) from an aqueous solutionby reverse osmosis

İpek, Ubeyde

doi:10.1016/j.desal.2004.09.009

Cited by 105 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Reverse osmosis study was carried out by using a pilot scale apparatus which is reported in detail by Ipek [58]. The filter used in the experimental work, manufactured by Osmonics, has extended blown microfiber technology to meet the requirements for a pure polypropylene deep filter with an exceptional dirt holding capability.…”

Section: Reverse Osmosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Stripping/flocculation/membrane bioreactor/reverse osmosis treatment of municipal landfill leachate

Hasar

Ünsal

İpek

et al. 2009

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Self Cite

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Reverse Osmosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Stripping/flocculation/membrane bioreactor/reverse osmosis treatment of municipal landfill leachate

Hasar

Ünsal

İpek

et al. 2009

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Self Cite

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The main disadvantages of this process are: (i) removal performance is equilibrium limited and sometimes regeneration of adsorbents is difficult, and (ii) adsorption is ineffective at very low concentrations of metal ions. Membrane processes such as microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis [7,8] have been investigated by many researchers for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Major limitations associated with these processes are membrane fouling and that pretreatment of effluents is generally required prior to use of the membrane module to reduce membrane fouling and flux decline.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Removal of Nickel and Boron from Plating Rinse Effluent by Electrochemical and Chemical Techniques

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this work, electrotreatment of nickel and boron containing plating rinse effluents was studied with mild steel and aluminum electrodes. Industrial effluent treatment directly by an electrochemical technique is capable of removing 80-85 % nickel. The residual nickel interfered with boron determination by curcumin method. The pH fall during electrotreatment in industrial effluent is due to electrodeposition of nickel at the cathode surface, evidenced by simulated effluent treatment. Nickel concentration can be reduced below the discharge limit from the industrial plating effluent by chemical precipitation and coagulation at pH above 8. Chemical precipitation showed maximum boron removal of about 50 %. Boron removal was 29.3-41.9 % and 20.6-33.1 % with ferric chloride and aluminum sulfate, respectively. A combination of chemical precipitation at pH 8.7 followed by electrotreatment reduces nickel to the discharge limit and also maximizes boron removal up to 59 %.

show abstract

“…Quist‐Jensen et al reported that more than 99.6% of the lithium can be enriched/recovered by an RO system from seawater where the lithium content was only 0.17 mg L −1 . Numerous authors have reported efficient removal of heavy metal including Co, Ni, and Mn from wastewater by RO . The above discussion justifies the technological feasibility of lithium recovery from LIB recycling industry wastewater.…”

Section: Hypothesis and Logical Feasibilitymentioning

confidence: 94%

Cost effective recovery of lithium from lithium ion battery by reverse osmosis and precipitation: a perspective

Swain

2017

J of Chemical Tech & Biotech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Production of lithium from primary resources is lagging behind demand (12% versus 16% in 2016), cost of lithium is increasing (between 40 and 60% in 2016), battery energy density rapidly increasing versus declining cost, and estimated lithium ion battery (LIB) markets size ($77.42 billion by 2024) driven by projected demands for plug‐in electric vehicles (PEVs) clearly justifies recycling. PEV technology and projected demand raise several challenges, including lithium demand/scarcity and future technology to recover lithium from LIB waste. To address the circular economy, steady supply chain security, self‐reliance, environment safety, environment directive, energy security, resources conservation, futuristic carbon footprint, WEEE directives and waste crime, recycling of LIB is an absolute essential. During the last decade, LIB recycling research and industrial recycling of LIB have attracted the interest of researchers, industrialists, and environmentalists. All have reported progress in the recovery of valuable metals like Co, but have rarely focused on lithium recovery. Hence, this paper addresses logical hypothesis and application of available technology in a fashion where lithium recycling from LIB can be addressed. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry

show abstract

Removal of Ni(II) and Zn(II) from an aqueous solutionby reverse osmosis

Cited by 105 publications

References 6 publications

Stripping/flocculation/membrane bioreactor/reverse osmosis treatment of municipal landfill leachate

Stripping/flocculation/membrane bioreactor/reverse osmosis treatment of municipal landfill leachate

Removal of Nickel and Boron from Plating Rinse Effluent by Electrochemical and Chemical Techniques

Cost effective recovery of lithium from lithium ion battery by reverse osmosis and precipitation: a perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About