2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-013-0053-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of nitric oxide and sulfur dioxide from flue gases using a FeII-ethylenediamineteraacetate solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it was detected the easy combination of NO with transition metals, so different metals were specifically designed for NO capture . All these absorbents were aqueous solutions, limited by the low NO solubility in water …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it was detected the easy combination of NO with transition metals, so different metals were specifically designed for NO capture . All these absorbents were aqueous solutions, limited by the low NO solubility in water …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 All these absorbents were aqueous solutions, limited by the low NO solubility in water. 18 In past years, ionic liquids (ILs) are proposed as new chemical solvents, attracting a huge number of studies in, for example, gas capture applications, 19 due to their characteristic properties such as high absorption capacity, low vapor pressure, and high thermal and chemical stability, 20 among others. Therefore, ILs have been extensively evaluated in gas capture, for instance, CO 2, 21 SO 2, 22 H 2 S, 23 NH 3, 24 and volatile organic compounds.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coal combustion is a major source of flue gas emissions, which contain nitrogen oxides (NO x ) and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). These pollutants have numerous negative impacts on aquatic life, human health, environmental balance, and ozone depletion. Compared to SO 2 , NO x is a relatively challenging to handle, as NO, which accounts for 90–95% of the NO x , has poor water solubility and cannot be removed through a simple alkali absorption process in the same way as SO 2 . , To facilitate the absorption of NO, metal complexes such as EDTA–Fe­(II) that can rapidly react with NO and form dissolved metal-nitrosyl complexes (e.g., EDTA–Fe­(II)–NO) have been employed. , This process is widely known as the wet scrubbing method for NO removal. Since the regeneration of metal complexes can be achieved by directly using SO 2 from the flue gas as the reductant source (i.e., via formation of SO 3 2– after absorption by the scrubber), the wet scrubbing method is of particular interest for the simultaneous removal of NO and SO 2 without additional chemical consumption. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the conversion of NO to N 2 O is a nonissue in the traditional wet scrubbing method with SO 2 as the reductant source. , However, the recovery and collection of N 2 O are difficult, as the produced N 2 O would easily escape from the system with the treated flue gas. ,, Furthermore, although the processes of NO absorption and reduction to N 2 O may be operated separately, the emission of N 2 O to the atmosphere still cannot be avoided because N 2 O is highly water-soluble, resulting in some of the produced N 2 O dissolving in the scrubber and reentering the absorption process, as shown in Figure A. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NO is one of the main air pollutants due to its contribution to acid rain, photochemical smog and depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer [1,2]. The most effective technique to eliminate NO is the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO with NH 3 [1,[3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%