1992
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/15.4.371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Ocular Artifacts From the REM Sleep EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We only considered oscillations above 2 Hz, as eye movement potentials mainly extend over 0.3 and 2 Hz (Tan et al, 2001). Moreover, eye movement artifacts are usually restricted to frontal derivations (Waterman et al, 1992), but in our study increased slow frequency power in phasic REM was spread (at a trend level) over more posterior regions, arguing against a mere effect of ocular contamination. Finally, slow frequency activity showed increased synchronization as measured by GFS and WPLI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…We only considered oscillations above 2 Hz, as eye movement potentials mainly extend over 0.3 and 2 Hz (Tan et al, 2001). Moreover, eye movement artifacts are usually restricted to frontal derivations (Waterman et al, 1992), but in our study increased slow frequency power in phasic REM was spread (at a trend level) over more posterior regions, arguing against a mere effect of ocular contamination. Finally, slow frequency activity showed increased synchronization as measured by GFS and WPLI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Because REM potentials are not manifested above 2 Hz (Tan et al ., ), spectral power values below this frequency range were excluded from the analyses; however, delta and theta power increases in phasic periods still might be related to the potentials generated by eye movements. The lack of delta and theta power increments in the posterior region supports this assumption, as ocular contamination is negligible in posterior leads (Waterman et al ., ). Increased spectral power in the high alpha and beta range during the tonic state as well as greater gamma activity during phasic periods was also reported in earlier scalp EEG (Abe et al ., ; Jouny et al ., ; Waterman et al ., ) and intracranial assessments (Gross and Gotman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, ocular artifact removal may have attenuated changes in delta power that might otherwise be present. 51 As we wanted to optimize electroencephalogram data for connectivity analyses, we did not employ the same artifact-removal strategies (e.g., ICA, visual inspection) as the spectral analyses, because these may interfere with phase synchronization data. 27,28 Thus, spectral and connectivity data results emerged from different data processing steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%