2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of phosphate and nitrate over a modified carbon residue from biomass gasification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods have been used for the removal of nitrate from water including ion-exchange resin, chemical reduction, electrodialysis, biological denitrification, reverse osmosis, nanofiltration [3,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, such methods usually suffer from low treatment efficiency and high operation costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been used for the removal of nitrate from water including ion-exchange resin, chemical reduction, electrodialysis, biological denitrification, reverse osmosis, nanofiltration [3,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, such methods usually suffer from low treatment efficiency and high operation costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case study, a wet impregnation method for the chemical activation was used. Carbon residue pretreatment is described in detail in Kilpimaa et al (2014). After the pretreatment, the sample and the chemical were mixed and the used contact time was five minutes.…”
Section: Chemical Activation Of the Carbon Residue Formed In Biomass mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured values of specific surface areas presented in Table 4agree with this argument. (Kilpimaa et al 2012(Kilpimaa et al , 2014…”
Section: Chemical Activation Of the Carbon Residue Formed In Biomass mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrate, due to its high water solubility, is possibly the most widespread groundwater contaminant in the world, imposing a serious threat to drinking water supplies including eutrophication and some diseases, such as cyanosis and cancer of the alimentary canal. Therefore, in recent years, much attention has been paid to remove this contaminant from water and several techniques have been applied for this purpose, including biological denitrification, reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, breakpoint chlorination, ion exchange, membrane filtration, and adsorption (Anirudhan and Rauf 2013;Demiral and Gündüzoğlu 2010;Ji et al 2014;Kilpimaa et al 2014;Mukherjee and De 2014;Sahinkaya et al 2014;Wan et al 2012;Wang et al 2007). However, current available technologies for NO 3 − removal suffer from low treatment efficiency and high operation cost and generate additional by-products (Bhatnagar and Sillanpää 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%