2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00108-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of resin acids and sterols from pulp mill effluents by activated sludge treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…an activated sludge system (Liver et al 1993;Pere et al 1993;Scott and Ollis 1995;Nakamura et al 1997;Novak et al 1998;Sarlin et al 1999;Thompson et al 2001;Diez et al 2002;Kostamo and Kukkonen 2003;Mahmood and Elliott 2006;Agridiotis et al 2007; Chakrabari et al 2008;Elliott and Mahmood 2012;Kaluža et al 2014). Figure 9 provides a schematic illustration of a clarifier unit that would follow such treatment.…”
Section: Secondary Treatment: Activated Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…an activated sludge system (Liver et al 1993;Pere et al 1993;Scott and Ollis 1995;Nakamura et al 1997;Novak et al 1998;Sarlin et al 1999;Thompson et al 2001;Diez et al 2002;Kostamo and Kukkonen 2003;Mahmood and Elliott 2006;Agridiotis et al 2007; Chakrabari et al 2008;Elliott and Mahmood 2012;Kaluža et al 2014). Figure 9 provides a schematic illustration of a clarifier unit that would follow such treatment.…”
Section: Secondary Treatment: Activated Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerobic biological treatment of wastewater is widely practiced in P&P mills (Ghem 1973;Costa et al 1974;Gergov et al 1988;LaPara and Alleman 1999;Schnell et al 2000a;Thompson et al 2001;Kostamo and Kukkonen 2003;Chakrabarti et al 2008;Kamali and Khodaparast 2015). One of the main objectives of aerated biological treatment is to reduce the BOD levels of the treated wastewater.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In case of somewhat similar water samples from wet debarking process, biological treatment was reported to result in ca. 70 % COD removal without significantly affecting colour, attributed to lignin (Leiviskä et al 2008); while a high percentage of the extractives can be removed biologically (Kostamo and Kukkonen 2003;Leiviskä et al 2009), even diluted effluents possess substantial toxicity, not to mention the possible breakthroughs of toxic influent during the periods of unstable operation of biological process. There has also been reported a possible increase in some of the remaining extractive compounds toxicity due to chemical transformations during biological treatment (Stahlschmidt-Allner et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%