1987
DOI: 10.1038/eye.1987.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of rust rings, comparing electric drill and hypodermic needle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Second, there is still no consensus on the best method for CFB removal (use of a burr versus a needle). 5 Finally, CFBs are associated with an increased risk of external contaminants and subsequent infectious keratitis (IK) that may be associated with an irreversible visual impairment. 6,7 IK has been shown to occur in up to 3% of CFB cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Second, there is still no consensus on the best method for CFB removal (use of a burr versus a needle). 5 Finally, CFBs are associated with an increased risk of external contaminants and subsequent infectious keratitis (IK) that may be associated with an irreversible visual impairment. 6,7 IK has been shown to occur in up to 3% of CFB cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corneal foreign body (FB) vertical (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and horizontal (A-E) localisation score as shown in Figure 1. Fig 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%