2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.113482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of saccharin by UV/persulfate process: Degradation kinetics, mechanism and DBPs formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degradation rate of iohexol slightly decreased with the increase of pH, whereas the degradation of diatrizoate gradually increased to the maximum as the pH increased from 5 to 7, and then slightly decreased as the pH further increased to 9. In the UV/PS process, SO 4 •− is the main reactive radical under acidic and neutral conditions, 30 9)), 34 whereas the generated HO• may be further scavenged by OH − in solution to form O• − with lower redox potential (eqn (10)), 35,36 which may decrease the rate of iohexol and diatrizoate degradation by the UV/PS process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degradation rate of iohexol slightly decreased with the increase of pH, whereas the degradation of diatrizoate gradually increased to the maximum as the pH increased from 5 to 7, and then slightly decreased as the pH further increased to 9. In the UV/PS process, SO 4 •− is the main reactive radical under acidic and neutral conditions, 30 9)), 34 whereas the generated HO• may be further scavenged by OH − in solution to form O• − with lower redox potential (eqn (10)), 35,36 which may decrease the rate of iohexol and diatrizoate degradation by the UV/PS process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UV/PS process, SO 4 · − is the main reactive radical under acidic and neutral conditions, 30 thus increasing the degradation rate of ICM under acidic and neutral conditions. With pH > 7, both SO 4 · − and HO· radicals will be present in the UV/PS oxidation process, and OH − in solution may react with SO 4 · − to form HO· and SO 4 2− (eqn (9)), 34 whereas the generated HO· may be further scavenged by OH − in solution to form O· − with lower redox potential (eqn (10)), 35,36 which may decrease the rate of iohexol and diatrizoate degradation by the UV/PS process.SO 4 · − + OH − → SO 4 2− + HO·HO· + OH − → H 2 O + O· − …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed to the fact that excessive free radicals may scavenge themselves or convert into other species with weaker redox potentials through reactions with S 2 O 8 2− (Eqs. 2 – 4 ) 33 , 34 . In summary, the results highlight the importance of optimizing the PAC and PMS dosage for efficient urea degradation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-4). 31,32 In summary, the results highlight the importance of optimizing the PAC and PMS dosage for e cient urea degradation. The ndings suggest that the synergistic effect between PMS and PAC, plays a crucial role in achieving high urea removal e ciency.…”
Section: Degradation Test Of Urea By Pac Assisted Sr-aopmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…which have a low redox potential (2.30 V, k = 3.6 10 5 ). 32 In contrast, the presence of CO 3 2signi cantly inhibited urea removal. When CO 3 2co-exists, the carbonate radicals (CO 3 -•) which have a low redox potential (1.63 V) could be formed.…”
Section: •)mentioning
confidence: 99%