2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.09.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Safranin dye from aqueous solution using magnetic mesoporous clay: Optimization study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dye removal percentage as a fraction of initial dye concentration can be defined as: where C 0 (mg/L) and C t (mg/L) are the initial dye concentration and dye concentration at time t , respectively [ 29 ]. The adsorption efficiency or adsorption capacity at equilibrium can be defined when the dye concentration of the solution reaches equilibrium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dye removal percentage as a fraction of initial dye concentration can be defined as: where C 0 (mg/L) and C t (mg/L) are the initial dye concentration and dye concentration at time t , respectively [ 29 ]. The adsorption efficiency or adsorption capacity at equilibrium can be defined when the dye concentration of the solution reaches equilibrium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safranin can cause eye burns which may be responsible for permanent injury to the cornea and conjunctiva in human and rabbit eyes. Contact with Safranin dye also causes skin and respiratory tract irritation [17]. The industrial applications of these dyes in different fields confirm the necessity for development of efficient adsorbents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, the test method to predict the separated efficiency between chalcopyrite and molybdenite was reliable in this research. The adequate precision ratio (AP, precision criterion) was 65.21/43.73 (>4), and the coefficient of variance (CV, precision criterion) was 0.84/4.60% (<10%), proving the high accuracy of the predictive model [30][31][32]. The multivariate correlation coefficient R 2 equal to 0.997/0.994 means that the model could explain the change of the response value to the extent of 99.7%/99.4% for chalcopyrite and molybdenite, respectively.…”
Section: Model Fittings and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%