2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

46
377
2
25

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 843 publications
(450 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
46
377
2
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Pilot-scale reactors have demonstrated consistent results with SMX removal rates ranging from 52 to 70 % regardless of initial SMX concentration (145 ng/L to 20 μg/L) (Clara et al 2005;Kim et al 2007;Reif et al 2008). Lab-scale MBR studies (9 and 14 L) have demonstrated SMX degradation as a function of pH and powdered activated carbon (PAC) dose.…”
Section: Removal In Mbrsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Pilot-scale reactors have demonstrated consistent results with SMX removal rates ranging from 52 to 70 % regardless of initial SMX concentration (145 ng/L to 20 μg/L) (Clara et al 2005;Kim et al 2007;Reif et al 2008). Lab-scale MBR studies (9 and 14 L) have demonstrated SMX degradation as a function of pH and powdered activated carbon (PAC) dose.…”
Section: Removal In Mbrsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In general, OD usually uses the extended aeration, which has a long SRT (20-40 days); Due to its big and batch reactor, SBR often operates with the SRT of 15-25 days; AAO usually operates with the SRT of 10-20 days; With the relatively simple process, AO possesses the relative short SRT (3-10 days). As an important parameter for activated sludge process design and operation (Batt et al, 2007;Clara et al, 2005), SRT may influence the levels of antibiotics in sludge.…”
Section: Treatment Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MBR outperforms the conventional activated sludge process (CAS) in many aspects including better effluent quality, smaller physical footprint, and lower sludge production (Melin et al, 2006). Because MBR technology is well-suited for water recycling applications, considerable research efforts have been devoted to the assessment of trace organic contaminants removal by MBR treatment (Clara et al, 2005;Joss et al, 2005;Kimura et al, 2007). These contaminants occur ubiquitously in domestic and industrial wastewater (Basile et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their presence in reclaimed water used for indirect potable recycling application even at very low concentration ranging from several ng/L to a few µg/L may present a potential ecotoxicological risk (Alexander et al, 2012). In comparison to CAS, MBR has been reported to show relatively better and/or more stable removal of trace organic contaminants possessing moderate to high biodegradability (Clara et al, 2005;De Wever et al, 2007). Although the effectiveness of MBR treatment for eliminating trace organic contaminants has been well demonstrated in the literature, recent studies have also shown the limitation of MBR in removing certain persistent compounds (Clara et al, 2005;Joss et al, 2005;Tadkaew et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation