2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-019-00570-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of sulfur contaminants from biogas to enable direct catalytic methanation

Abstract: In the near future, renewable energy sources will replace fossil energy. To allow full carbon utilization of renewable biomass, we have demonstrated a possible integration between a biogas reactor, an electrolysis unit, and a catalytic methanation reactor. Stringent removal of all sulfur contaminants in raw biogas is required to enable this integration. We demonstrate how existing bulk sulfur removal solutions, like a biotrickling filter loaded with Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and impregnated activated carbo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The backup carbon filter could not remove all the bulk sulfur from the biogas to ppb levels required by the Ni catalyst. A potential future improvement could be a sacrificial ZnO adsorbent before the active Ni catalyst, which can reduce the sulfur level to ppb in case of such unforeseen conditions [35,36]. Still, it was surprising to see that the catalyst was active and showing more than 90% CO 2 conversion at all the time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The backup carbon filter could not remove all the bulk sulfur from the biogas to ppb levels required by the Ni catalyst. A potential future improvement could be a sacrificial ZnO adsorbent before the active Ni catalyst, which can reduce the sulfur level to ppb in case of such unforeseen conditions [35,36]. Still, it was surprising to see that the catalyst was active and showing more than 90% CO 2 conversion at all the time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fuels derived from natural sources, the concentration of sulfur species can be included within a very wide range. For example, the sulfur level in biodiesel is present as trace, and in amounts lower than 10 mg/Kg [47,48], while the sulfur level in biogas-mainly present as H 2 S-is 1500 ppm v on average [49,50].…”
Section: Fundamentals On Sulfur Poisoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included from earlier work. 23 Reaction Chemistry & Engineering Paper point at 280°C (the desired reactor temperature 23 ). The specific dimensions of the two reactor tubes is proprietary information of Haldor Topsøe A/S.…”
Section: Methanation Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This double pass strategy ensures a methane content/Wobbe index within the specifications of natural gas. 23 Actual gas composition is measured by a gas chromatograph (Micro GC 490, Agilent Technologies, United States) equipped with two channels (MS5A and PPQ columns) and a thermal conductivity detector allowing analysis of hydrogen, nitrogen, methane, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. Using automatic sampling, the GC performs online analysis, but some delay is expected due to machine processing time and the physical distance the sample has to travel to the GC.…”
Section: Methanation Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%