2006
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927606064853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Surface Damage from Focused Ion Beam using Plasma Cleaner

Abstract: Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2006 in Chicago, Illinois, USA, July 30 – August 3, 2005

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, 2 keV polishing is sufficiently low in energy to yield the least FIB damage in Si and would also provide for better imaging resolution and placement of the ion beam compared to 1 keV. The residual FIB damage could easily be removed in a plasma cleaning operation prior to (S)TEM analysis [1,4]. In addition, Ga + bombardment at 700 eV and 500 eV shows evidence of a growing Garich deposition layer which is probably a result of the sputter yield dropping below a value of 1 at these low energies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, 2 keV polishing is sufficiently low in energy to yield the least FIB damage in Si and would also provide for better imaging resolution and placement of the ion beam compared to 1 keV. The residual FIB damage could easily be removed in a plasma cleaning operation prior to (S)TEM analysis [1,4]. In addition, Ga + bombardment at 700 eV and 500 eV shows evidence of a growing Garich deposition layer which is probably a result of the sputter yield dropping below a value of 1 at these low energies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%