2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of the superficial zone of bovine articular cartilage does not increase its frictional coefficient

Abstract: The topmost ( approximately 100 microm) superficial zone of articular cartilage does not have special properties which enhances its frictional response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that μ eq increases following GAG digestion is consistent with our recent study which found that μ eq is higher at the articular surface than right underneath it or at the deep zone [24]. Both studies imply that μ eq increases with decreasing GAG content, even though the current study altered GAG content enzymatically while the earlier study employed mechanical means (microtoming) to expose regions of cartilage with increasing GAG content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation that μ eq increases following GAG digestion is consistent with our recent study which found that μ eq is higher at the articular surface than right underneath it or at the deep zone [24]. Both studies imply that μ eq increases with decreasing GAG content, even though the current study altered GAG content enzymatically while the earlier study employed mechanical means (microtoming) to expose regions of cartilage with increasing GAG content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The friction measurements were performed in a previously described custom-designed testing apparatus [24]. Sliding motion was provided by a computer controlled translation stage (PM500-1L, Newport Corporation CA), while normal and frictional loads were measured with a multi-axial load cell (20E12A-M25B, JR3 Inc, CA).…”
Section: Friction Apparatus and Testing Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface roughness values of the control samples (typically 271 AE 23 nm) (Fig. 4A, B) are comparable with the roughness of articular cartilage surfaces measured with micrometer-sized probe tips (379 AE 83 nm) 34 and blunt probe tips (462 AE 216 nm). 32 The decrease in the friction coefficient of the articular cartilage treated with IL-1b is likely culture condition dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Contact was modeled between cartilage surfaces as well as between the superior cap surface and the apposing tibial surface, and between the cap sides and the adjacent talar cartilage surface. The coefficients of friction assigned for cartilage-on-cartilage contact (m = 0.01) and implant-on-cartilage contact (m = 0.1) were derived from the literature [43][44][45][46] . A vertical load of 300 N, corresponding to that used experimentally, was applied to the model in neutral apposition, with the talus free to seat itself according to its mating with the apposing tibial articular surface.…”
Section: Computational Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%