2015
DOI: 10.1021/nn5072528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Thiol Ligands from Surface-Confined Nanoparticles without Particle Growth or Desorption

Abstract: Size-dependent properties of surface-confined inorganic nanostructures are of interest for applications ranging from sensing to catalysis and energy production. Ligand-stabilized nanoparticles are attractive precursors for producing such nanostructures because the stabilizing ligands may be used to direct assembly of thoroughly characterized nanoparticles on the surface. Upon assembly; however, the ligands block the active surface of the nanoparticle. Methods used to remove these ligands typically result in re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the capping agent has been removed, the Au nanoparticle interacts directly with the support, leading to decreased mobility and thus decreased sintering. This was also observed by Elliott et al [26], who showed an increase in Au nanoparticle size only when no more S signal from the residual capping agent was observed in XPS. The XPS data (discussed in more detail below) show that the as-prepared Au nanoparticles are metallic, whereas the ozone-treated Au nanoparticles are cationic.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Once the capping agent has been removed, the Au nanoparticle interacts directly with the support, leading to decreased mobility and thus decreased sintering. This was also observed by Elliott et al [26], who showed an increase in Au nanoparticle size only when no more S signal from the residual capping agent was observed in XPS. The XPS data (discussed in more detail below) show that the as-prepared Au nanoparticles are metallic, whereas the ozone-treated Au nanoparticles are cationic.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For a sulphur-containing capping agent, Menard et al showed a tripling of the nanoparticle size (from 0.8 to 2.7 nm) upon calcination at 400 °C, whereas the particle size increase was limited to 1.2 nm after ozone treatment [25]. Elliott et al [26] found that slight sintering only occurred after all capping agent had been removed by the ozone treatment. The particle size stayed at 1.4 nm upon partial capping agent removal and increased to 1.6 nm when the S signal was no longer observed in the XP spectra.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, this goal is not always realized. For example, Elliot and coworkers reported that thiol‐stabilized 1.4 nm diameter Au NCs increased in size after 16 min of ozone cleaning, while the size didn't change significantly for up to 8 min of ozone cleaning . We previously studied the ozone stability of the THPC Au 1.6nm NCs, showing a significant size increase after just 1–2 minutes .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Whether the ligands are strongly‐attached or weakly‐attached, researchers have developed various treatments to remove stabilizers in order to render the metal surface more active for the application of interest. These treatments include ozone cleaning, thermal treatment, or chemical and electrochemical treatments . Unfortunately, the treatment may change the size of the NCs in addition to removing the stabilizer .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%