2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of trihalomethanes from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
51
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the rejection efficiencies of BDCM and DBCM were practically 100%. As observed in previous similar studies (Uyak et al, 2008), the removal efficiency of M3 process was increased with increasing the molecular weight of THM species. As bromine atom replace the chlorine atoms, greatly increasing the molecular weight, resulted in higher removal efficiency.…”
Section: Thm Rejection Capacity Of the Evaluated Systemssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the rejection efficiencies of BDCM and DBCM were practically 100%. As observed in previous similar studies (Uyak et al, 2008), the removal efficiency of M3 process was increased with increasing the molecular weight of THM species. As bromine atom replace the chlorine atoms, greatly increasing the molecular weight, resulted in higher removal efficiency.…”
Section: Thm Rejection Capacity Of the Evaluated Systemssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Total THM rejection of M3 process was approximately equals to 74% during the complete experiment, which could be considered a suitable result, since similar results were obtained when using nanofiltration membranes at higher pressures (Uyak et al, 2008), and considering the fact that M3 is a microfiltration membrane operating only by gravity.…”
Section: Thm Rejection Capacity Of the Evaluated Systemssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations