2016
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1040848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of typical antibiotics in the advanced treatment process of productive drinking water

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThis study investigated the fate of six artificial antibiotics during treatment process of an industrial-scale drinking water treatment plant in China. The results showed that all the antibiotics can be effectively removed by the advanced treatment process. The average concentrations of the six antibiotics ranged from 1 to 43 ng/L in the influent while from nondetected to 6 ng/L in the effluent. The antibiotic removal efficiencies were 91% for total antibiotics, 85% for amoxicillin, 92% for tetr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Liu et al . ; Priya et al . ), it is important to know and evaluate the possible effects of its by‐products in the environment, especially in the aquatic systems.…”
Section: Photodegradation As Remediation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Liu et al . ; Priya et al . ), it is important to know and evaluate the possible effects of its by‐products in the environment, especially in the aquatic systems.…”
Section: Photodegradation As Remediation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, authors (Liu et al . ) who performed their experiments using drinking water treatment plant—DWTP (pH ≈ 8.0 and [TOC] = 3.0 mg L −1 ) and an ozone dose of 1 mg L −1 , during approximately 15 min, obtained 57% of OTC (≈42 ng L −1 ) removal. Other authors (Zheng et al .…”
Section: Effects Of Otc In Water Quality In Recirculating/reuse Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exception was explained by the greater selectivity of ozone towards sulfaquinoxaline compared to hydroxyl radicals [24]. At a full-scale DWTP, ozonation was the main step responsible for antibiotics degradation, with an removal rate of 65% for 1 mg/L of ozone [158]. Removal rates during ozonation may be reduced by organic matter and inorganic salts in water resources which can act as scavengers during radical reactions [24,48,151].…”
Section: 212mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coal-based carbon was a bit more efficient, maybe due to a larger pore volume, but it was not significantly different. Biological activated carbon filtration can also be used as in [158]. For a contact time of 15 minutes, this system accounted for 23%, 23% 20%, 19%, 17% of amoxicillin, sulfamethoxazole, oxytetracycline, sulfamethazine and tetracycline removals respectively.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibiotics had lower detection frequencies in tap water than in water resources. The processes applied in DWTPs allow a partial removal of VPRs, as has already been observed in the literature (Boleda et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2016;Stackelberg et al, 2007). However, the opposite phenomenon was observed for the antiparasitic drugs toltrazuril and triclabendazole and also for their metabolites.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 67%