2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of undesirable MC1R gene alleles from ‘Berrenda en Negro’, an endangered Spanish cattle breed, to enhance breed conservation programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, animals belonging to BC reference population that were born in 2018 showed a lower consanguinity rate than animals born in 2017, while BN animals that were born in 2018, appeared to be higher inbred than those from 2017. to BC reference population that were born in 2018 showed a lower consanguinity rate than animals born in 2017, while BN animals that were born in 2018, appeared to be higher inbred than those from 2017. The tendency to increase inbreeding (F) and differences entre las both "berrenda" cattle breeds might also be determined by the different phenotypic (and genotypic selection actions carried out for the eradication of recessive MC1R locus alleles in BN and the eradication of the 1;29 Robertsonian translocation (t1:29) [14,15] in both breeds and on the other hand, a consequence of the increase in the quality of pedigree information. It should be noted that if higher inbreeding values were estimated in more recent periods due to an improvement in pedigree information, this would lead to overestimate the annual increase in inbreeding rate (Figure 9).…”
Section: Inbreeding Analysis and Non-random Mating Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…So, animals belonging to BC reference population that were born in 2018 showed a lower consanguinity rate than animals born in 2017, while BN animals that were born in 2018, appeared to be higher inbred than those from 2017. to BC reference population that were born in 2018 showed a lower consanguinity rate than animals born in 2017, while BN animals that were born in 2018, appeared to be higher inbred than those from 2017. The tendency to increase inbreeding (F) and differences entre las both "berrenda" cattle breeds might also be determined by the different phenotypic (and genotypic selection actions carried out for the eradication of recessive MC1R locus alleles in BN and the eradication of the 1;29 Robertsonian translocation (t1:29) [14,15] in both breeds and on the other hand, a consequence of the increase in the quality of pedigree information. It should be noted that if higher inbreeding values were estimated in more recent periods due to an improvement in pedigree information, this would lead to overestimate the annual increase in inbreeding rate (Figure 9).…”
Section: Inbreeding Analysis and Non-random Mating Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…BN and BC effective population sizes were estimated for their respective reference populations, based on family size variance (Nes) (BN = 147.05 and BC = 190.18); and also, they were estimated for the corresponding individual increasing of inbreeding for a similar contribution of founders (Nei) [52,53], being in a general way, low in both "berrenda" cattle breeds (9.93 ± 3.76 in BN and 11.58 ± 4.81 in BC). The tendency to increase inbreeding (F) and differences between both "berrenda" cattle breeds might also be determined by the different phenotypic (and genotypic selection actions carried out for the eradication of recessive MC1R locus alleles in BN and the eradication of the 1;29 Robertsonian translocation (t1:29) [14,15] in both breeds and on the other hand, a consequence of the increase in the quality of pedigree information. It should be noted that if higher inbreeding values were estimated in more recent periods due to an improvement in pedigree information, this would lead to overestimate the annual increase in inbreeding rate (Figure 9).…”
Section: Inbreeding Analysis and Non-random Mating Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations