2012
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of water-soluble and protein-bound solutes with reversed mid-dilution versus post-dilution haemodiafiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, both techniques were similarly effective in reducing the microinflammatory state in the patient. A recent study [21] supports our findings. They compared the total solute removal of mid-dilution and post-dilution HDF which was not different for both small water-soluble and protein-bound compounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, both techniques were similarly effective in reducing the microinflammatory state in the patient. A recent study [21] supports our findings. They compared the total solute removal of mid-dilution and post-dilution HDF which was not different for both small water-soluble and protein-bound compounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The RR and TRS values behaved similarly for different dialysis modalities and settings for urea, IS and IAA as mean RR and TRS values were significantly lower for conventional low-flux dialysis than for other dialysis settings for all solutes (p < 0.001), which is in good relation with results of the previous studies [51,52]. However, Trp RR values were not influenced by dialysis modality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This novel analysis suggests that changes in β 2 M concentration explain one third of the estimated benefit of minimally reused HF dialyzers, while the remainder is accounted for by direct effects which are not related to β 2 M. Thus, in spite of the theoretical predominance of the “middle molecule” hypothesis on dialysis technology research[ 62 ], a closer examination of HEMO suggests that removal of these uremic solutes may have only a modest effect on outcomes. Although β 2 M is considered a marker for the entire spectrum of “middle” molecule toxins [ 63 , 64 ], other uremic retention solutes may demonstrate dialytic kinetics that differ from those of β 2 M [ 65 , 66 ]. It is conceivable that the direct flux effect, could be ascribed to an imprecise quantification of middle molecule exposure by the predialysis β 2 M concentration, the removal of other molecules or to non-clearance effects of dialyzers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%