2014
DOI: 10.1111/ans.12796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remove the migrated stent: sigmoid colon perforation from migrated biliary stent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be useful if the stent has migrated significantly (e.g. a migrated PS to the colon 101 ) or if a perforation has occurred as suggested by extraluminal gas. The sensitivity of plain X-ray is low, however, and the study may not detect retroperitoneal perforation.…”
Section: International Consensus For Dbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be useful if the stent has migrated significantly (e.g. a migrated PS to the colon 101 ) or if a perforation has occurred as suggested by extraluminal gas. The sensitivity of plain X-ray is low, however, and the study may not detect retroperitoneal perforation.…”
Section: International Consensus For Dbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stent perforations were small in area and the stent lumens were narrow, which prevented feces from flowing out of the intestine; therefore, the treatment was relatively minimally invasive for colonic perforations. The sigmoid colon is often reported as a site of colorectal perforation [ 18 , 19 ]. In our case, the sigmoid colon was stenotic due to repeated sigmoid diverticulitis, and the migrated bile duct stent was thought to have lodged in the sigmoid colon, resulting in a perforation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of long-term treatment, stent migration can cause complications which can lead to life-threatening situations and sometimes diagnosis can be difficult due to absence of typical symptoms. To date, a small number of works are available concerning sigmoid perforation from a biliary stent [15], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. In most cases, the patient had concurrent diverticulosis or abdominal adhesions, which increase the risk for colonic perforation [7], [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%