2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-011-0147-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing arsenic from aqueous solution and long-term product storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of fluoride removal using electro coagulation, Al-alloyed have shown better efficiency that Fe electrodes [133]. The similitude of both processes [36,37,[134][135][136] suggests that Al-alloyed materials will be better for fluoride mitigation [137,138]. Coincidentally, such materials have already been developed and used for other contaminants including pathogens [134,135,139,140].…”
Section: /9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of fluoride removal using electro coagulation, Al-alloyed have shown better efficiency that Fe electrodes [133]. The similitude of both processes [36,37,[134][135][136] suggests that Al-alloyed materials will be better for fluoride mitigation [137,138]. Coincidentally, such materials have already been developed and used for other contaminants including pathogens [134,135,139,140].…”
Section: /9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At many production sites, arsenic trioxide is accumulated and stored until a suitable technology for its disposal is developed. Arsenic is traditionally removed from industrial wastewaters from mineral processing and metallurgical operations by lime neutralization with co-precipitation of arsenic with ferric iron Twidwell and McCloskey, 2011). Arsenical ferrihydrite precipitation requires a high iron consumption with respect to arsenic, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arsenical ferrihydrite precipitation requires a high iron consumption with respect to arsenic, i.e. Fe/As >4 and thus large amounts of waste material are produced Twidwell and McCloskey, 2011). Solideliquid separation of arsenical ferrihydrite is extremely inefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hereby, reduction is mostly regarded as a stand-alone removal mechanism and possible paths for contaminant reduction in Fe [21,141,142]. The removal of arsenic and selenium species have also been documented, but the importance of reduction was less emphasized [40,108,134,[143][144][145][146][147].…”
Section: Back To the Fe 0 Remediation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%