2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-016-0513-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing Cardiac Artefacts in Magnetoencephalography with Resampled Moving Average Subtraction

Abstract: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals are commonly contaminated by cardiac artefacts (CAs). Principle component analysis and independent component analysis have been widely used for removing CAs, but they typically require a complex procedure for the identification of CA-related components. We propose a simple and efficient method, resampled moving average subtraction (RMAS), to remove CAs from MEG data. Based on an electrocardiogram (ECG) channel, a template for each cardiac cycle was estimated by a weighted a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cardiac artifacts include the direct interference of voltage gradients or magnetic fields generated by the cardiac cycle at cranial sensor locations (Sun et al, 2016), as well as artifacts related to associated cardiovascular (blood flow) processes, often referred to as pulse artifacts (Tamburro et al, 2019). These two types of cardiac artifacts differ in their temporal profile, with vascular artifacts showing a slower, smoother time course and electrical artifacts reflecting the cardiac cycle, thus including a sharp transient deflection corresponding to the R-wave of the electrocardiogram.…”
Section: Cardiac and Respiratory Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac artifacts include the direct interference of voltage gradients or magnetic fields generated by the cardiac cycle at cranial sensor locations (Sun et al, 2016), as well as artifacts related to associated cardiovascular (blood flow) processes, often referred to as pulse artifacts (Tamburro et al, 2019). These two types of cardiac artifacts differ in their temporal profile, with vascular artifacts showing a slower, smoother time course and electrical artifacts reflecting the cardiac cycle, thus including a sharp transient deflection corresponding to the R-wave of the electrocardiogram.…”
Section: Cardiac and Respiratory Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been successful in removing cardiac interference from EEG and MEG data (Viola et al, 2009; Sun et al, 2016; Mannan et al, 2018), however, there are still several outstanding issues which present challenges to the field. Although some methods work well in specific contexts (Urrestarazu et al, 2004; Abtahi et al, 2014; Hamaneh et al, 2014; Navarro et al, 2015), wide-spread application across multiple acquisition platforms and conditions remains to be evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some epochs with significant movements or eye movements/blinks artefacts detected by fieldtrip 2 software were discarded. The heart beat artefacts are ignored in the research of the evoke response due to the less influence after averaging (Sun et al, 2016). The SEF was averaged across varying number of epochs from 20 to 199.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%