DOI: 10.32657/10356/11827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing heavy metals and organic contaminants from solids using an Upward Electrokinetic Soil Remedial (UESR) technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the treatments showed that the removal efficiency for Cd was the highest (45% to 72%), followed by Zn (38% to 62%) and Pb (9% to 37%). Previous studies have shown that the removal efficiency of Cd or Zn was generally better than Pb (Huang 2005;Kim et al 2001;Vengris et al 2001;Virkutyte et al 2002;Wang et al 2006).…”
Section: Removal Efficiency Of Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All the treatments showed that the removal efficiency for Cd was the highest (45% to 72%), followed by Zn (38% to 62%) and Pb (9% to 37%). Previous studies have shown that the removal efficiency of Cd or Zn was generally better than Pb (Huang 2005;Kim et al 2001;Vengris et al 2001;Virkutyte et al 2002;Wang et al 2006).…”
Section: Removal Efficiency Of Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 94%