2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing organic and nitrogen content from a highly saline municipal wastewater reverse osmosis concentrate by UV/H2O2–BAC treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high nutrient uptake capacity of algal cells (Table 5) and stockpiling of nutrients in nutrient-replete conditions led to higher nutrient uptake and greater biomass productivity of the semi-continuous mode compared to batch mode. As a comparison, semi-continuous treatment could achieve comparable TN removal efficiency (> 50% within 48 h) with that reported in previous studies on ROC treatment using BAC (60%) (Pradhan et al 2015), UV/H 2 O 2 -BAC (60%), biological aerated filter (BAF) (65%) (Choi 2015) (Lu et al 2013), and BAF (67%) (Choi 2015). Furthermore, since the presence of ammonia and organic pollutants in ROC streams is of great concern due to their toxic nature (Smetana et al 2017), the high efficiency of NH 3 -N and DOC removal in short period cycles is another attractive benefit of the algal treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The high nutrient uptake capacity of algal cells (Table 5) and stockpiling of nutrients in nutrient-replete conditions led to higher nutrient uptake and greater biomass productivity of the semi-continuous mode compared to batch mode. As a comparison, semi-continuous treatment could achieve comparable TN removal efficiency (> 50% within 48 h) with that reported in previous studies on ROC treatment using BAC (60%) (Pradhan et al 2015), UV/H 2 O 2 -BAC (60%), biological aerated filter (BAF) (65%) (Choi 2015) (Lu et al 2013), and BAF (67%) (Choi 2015). Furthermore, since the presence of ammonia and organic pollutants in ROC streams is of great concern due to their toxic nature (Smetana et al 2017), the high efficiency of NH 3 -N and DOC removal in short period cycles is another attractive benefit of the algal treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Increased demand for potable water, coupled with more stringent water quality regulations, has driven growth in the use of a suite of pressure‐driven liquid phase membrane separation, which produce high quality water while requiring less space than traditional treatment processes . The low pressure membranes, such as microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF), are utilised in municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater treatment to remove colloids and suspended matter, while high pressure membranes, such as nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO), are now used extensively in the field of desalination (seawater and brackish) and water reclamation for the rejection of soluble or ionic species …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one significant disadvantage of RO process for municipal wastewater reclamation is linked to the disposal of a concentrated (Azaïs et al, 2016;Bagastyo et al, 2011;Hurwitz et al, 2014;Miralles-Cuevas et al, 2017;Pérez et al, 2010). Municipal RO concentrate is typically characterized by a pH range of 6.9-8.8, high levels of conductivity (1.7-23.5 mS cm -1 ), persistent organic matters (DOC: 14-68 mg L −1 ) and a broad range of emerging organic contaminants (Bagastyo et al, 2011;Deng, 2020;Pérez et al, 2010;Pradhan et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2011). The concentration of micropollutants in RO concentrate usually multiplies by a factor of 2-7 as compared to RO feed water (Bagastyo et al, 2011;Pérez-González et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%