2016
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2016.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal cell carcinoma escapes death by p53 depletion through transglutaminase 2-chaperoned autophagy

Abstract: In renal cell carcinoma, transglutaminase 2 (TGase 2) crosslinks p53 in autophagosomes, resulting in p53 depletion and the tumor's evasion of apoptosis. Inhibition of TGase 2 stabilizes p53 and induces tumor cells to enter apoptosis. This study explored the mechanism of TGase 2-dependent p53 degradation. We found that TGase 2 competes with human double minute 2 homolog (HDM2) for binding to p53; promotes autophagy-dependent p53 degradation in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines under starvation; and binds to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
104
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this ensemble of data regarding ccRCC may explain why ccRCC shows resistance to therapeutics, it did not identify any specific therapeutic target for ccRCC. Although transglutaminase 2 (TGase 2) expression is reported to be high in ccRCC, and TGase 2 inhibition showed significant potential for a therapeutic approach for ccRCC in a series of past studies [19][20][21][22][23], the CPTAC study did not reveal any significance of TGase 2 in ccRCC [18]. These analytical results did not seem to fit, in the overall effort to find a cure for ccRCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this ensemble of data regarding ccRCC may explain why ccRCC shows resistance to therapeutics, it did not identify any specific therapeutic target for ccRCC. Although transglutaminase 2 (TGase 2) expression is reported to be high in ccRCC, and TGase 2 inhibition showed significant potential for a therapeutic approach for ccRCC in a series of past studies [19][20][21][22][23], the CPTAC study did not reveal any significance of TGase 2 in ccRCC [18]. These analytical results did not seem to fit, in the overall effort to find a cure for ccRCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in differentiation-induced BRAF-mutated human melanoma cells, it is not the expression of the enzyme that is increased, but rather its activity, as recently reported (Tabolacci et al 2016). Another interesting case is represented by clear cell renal carcinoma (CCRC) which is characterized by high expression of Tgase2, whose main target in this tumor is p53, which is crosslinked by the enzyme and addressed for degradation via autophagy (Kang et al 2016). p53 is a well-known oncogene suppressor, and its degradation prevents apoptosis and favors conversely tumor survival and growth (Kang et al 2016).…”
Section: The Pathology: Protective and Aggressive Actions Of Tgase2mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Within this frame, it is hypothesized that Tgase can, by interacting with BAX via its BH3-domain, control the release of cytochrome c and apoptosisinducing factor (AIF) from mitochondria leading to both caspase-dependent and -independent cell death pathways (Rodolfo et al 2004;Yoo et al 2012). In this context, the role played by Tgase2 in the process of autophagy which is deficient in cells lacking Tgase2 is also important (D'Eletto et al 2010(D'Eletto et al , 2012Altuntas et al 2015;Kang et al 2016). Another interesting novel aspect of the presence of Tgase2 at the mitochondrial level is its involvement in the energy metabolism.…”
Section: The Physiology: Integrated Responses Of Cells and Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The yellow diamonds represent the prognostic SFs. 49 In addition, oxidative phosphorylation was considered a vital behavior related to apoptosis which could induce cell death in cancers. In addition, the red lines indicate the positive correlation while the blue lines indicate the negative correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%