SUMMARY It has been known for some time that oxygen and certain electron affinic radiosensitizers exhibit less effective enhancement of cell kill at low clinically relevant X-ray doses, a behavior which has still not been adequately explained. This is further complicated by more recent findings that a t low concentrations of nitroimidazoles there are anomalous results on hypoxic low dose radiosensitization. In the low dose range below 1 Gy, where survival is high, we have reexamined radiosensitization of hypoxic hamster cells by etanidazole at various concentrations (200-2,000 pM) using automated microscopic localization of cells to obtain more precise measurements of survival. As previously observed, etanidazole a t low concentrations (200 pM) was found to be more effective at low (-1 Gy, survival -SOY0) rather than high (survival -2%) X-ray doses. When plotted as absolute sensitivity, data for high concentrations of etanidazole (>1,000 pM) fall in one area of the D&' vs. D2-' plot, whereas concentrations below 1,000 pM might be suggested to behave "differently," and several explanations are suggested. One of these involves a structure of the survival curve which has been suggested to reflect induced repair. This structure is modified a t the higher concentration of etanidazole, but there is little effect a t 200 pM. An alternate proposal considers accessibility of DNA to drug, or type of lesions affected as possible explanations for the apparent differential sensitization by etani'dazole a t high and low X-ray doses. In summary, a clinically relevant concentration of etanidazole provides relatively good radiosensitization a t low, clinically relevant radiation doses; thus hypoxic sensitizers may affect survival in those cell lines which have a large survival curve shoulder since the extent of the shoulder is purported to reflect the degree of induced radioresistance.