2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2332-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal dimensions measured by ultrasonography in children: variations as a function of the imaging plane and patient position

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of patient positioning on sonographic renal measurements and to test if the patient position alters the three-dimensional shape of the kidneys. The maximum longitudinal renal length and transverse renal width and depth were measured in the supine and prone position in 100 children (200 kidneys). Age ranged from 6 months to 16 years (mean age 5 years). The results were compared for statistically significant differences. The maximum measured longitudinal rena… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of kidney length (KL) were performed using 5-8 MHz linear or curved array transducers (7 MHz) (HDI Philips 5000). A single maximal longitudinal measurement of each kidney was obtained sonographically in the supine position [20][21][22]. Renal length measurement was performed because this method has been reported to have the lowest inter-observer variation and better reproducibility compared with sonographic volumetric estimations of the renal size, especially when comparing repeated measurements [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of kidney length (KL) were performed using 5-8 MHz linear or curved array transducers (7 MHz) (HDI Philips 5000). A single maximal longitudinal measurement of each kidney was obtained sonographically in the supine position [20][21][22]. Renal length measurement was performed because this method has been reported to have the lowest inter-observer variation and better reproducibility compared with sonographic volumetric estimations of the renal size, especially when comparing repeated measurements [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michel et al [45] found a significant difference in kidney length between the supine and prone positions. Therefore, we measured kidney length only in the supine position in all the children involved in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The limitation of sonographically measured renal length and its interpretation in the context of published normative standards have been reviewed in detail elsewhere [15]. One of the major potential limitations discussed in the literature is the possible influence of patient position and imaging projection on measured renal length [16][17][18]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michel et al [17] compared the supine with the prone position and reported that renal length measured in children in the supine position is greater than that measured in the prone position. They suggested that this difference was due to position-dependent changes in the degree of filling of the renal calyces and pelvis, as well as errors in caliper distance measurements for the different scan depths (supine vs prone).…”
Section: Normal Renal Measurements In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 97%