1966
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-39-467-837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal Fibrolipomatosis

Abstract: Four patients with renal fibrolipomatosis are presented. The clinical and radiological features are discussed, attention being drawn to the diagnostic appearances seen on the excretion pyelogram. It is suggested that the condition be classed into primary and secondary varieties. A relationship between infection, hilar lymphatic obstruction and fibro-fatty overgrowth is postulated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age Incidence.-Both in our series and in the combined series the maximum incidence is found in the sixth decade. Causes.-The following have been stated to be aetiologically related to renal sinus lipomatosis (Kutzmann, 1931;Roth and Davidson, 1938;Faegenburg et al, 1964;Kreel et al, 1966):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Age Incidence.-Both in our series and in the combined series the maximum incidence is found in the sixth decade. Causes.-The following have been stated to be aetiologically related to renal sinus lipomatosis (Kutzmann, 1931;Roth and Davidson, 1938;Faegenburg et al, 1964;Kreel et al, 1966):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic Criteria.-As renal sinus lipomatosis is not known to produce symptoms distinct from those of any underlying disease (Kreel et al, 1966) or, as is more frequent nowadays, by the radiologist. The radiological diagnostic criteria used in this study are based on the work of Windholz (1951), Olsson andWeiland (1963), Faegenburg et al (1964), and Kreel et al (1966).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is usually asymptomatic [12] and discovered mainly as a chance radiological finding [11]. The main sign is microscopic [9] and rarely macroscopic haematuria. The aetiology is unknown, although reflux, artherosclerosis, recurrent urinary tract infections and obesity have been suggested as predisposing factors [2,3], The most common type is replacement lipomatosis where the excess of adipose tissue replaces renal tissue destroyed by renal parenchymal diseases [1].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%