1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38954-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal Function and Upper Urinary Tract Configuration Following Urinary Diversion to a Continent Ileal Reservoir (Kock Pouch): A Prospective 5 To 11-Year Followup after Reservoir Construction

Abstract: We followed 17 patients who underwent urinary diversion via a continent ileal reservoir (Kock pouch) with yearly examinations for 5 to 11 years postoperatively. The examinations involved control of renal function and configuration of the upper urinary tract. In 5 patients the upper urinary tract had become dilated during followup and in 2 of these renal scarring also had developed. All 5 patients had endured temporary outflow obstruction or reflux (stricture, overdistension of the reservoir or a defective anti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that the complication rate of any new technique of urinary diversion should be compared to that of the gold standard Bricker ileal conduit [8, 35, 36]. Although the ileal conduit has stood the test of time for 5 decades, many series have verified significant renal and metabolic complications in the long run [37, 38, 39, 40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that the complication rate of any new technique of urinary diversion should be compared to that of the gold standard Bricker ileal conduit [8, 35, 36]. Although the ileal conduit has stood the test of time for 5 decades, many series have verified significant renal and metabolic complications in the long run [37, 38, 39, 40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several surgical techniques are currently employed to prevent reflux [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], but to date it is unknown whether antireflux ureteral implantation in a low pressure reservoir is necessary because no coordinated contraction of the neobladder can cause an isolated intravescical pressure increase and possible reflux during micturition [7]. Nevertheless we agree with the urologists who assert that effective antireflux ureteral implantation is preferable because it may prevent hydronephrosis and pyelonephritis in females who could develop hypercontinence [8]or in males with a long life expectancy who could present severe voiding dysfunctions related to stenosis of the uretho–intestinal anastomosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important demand for any bladder substitute is that it should not endanger the integrity of the upper urinary tract [2]. The Kock reservoir fulfils these essential criteria of a highly compliant internal reservoir in that it is truly continent, easy to catheterize and prevents reflux to the kidneys [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%