2017
DOI: 10.4103/injr.injr_93_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal function in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this study was insu cient to explain the safety of kidney function in patients with AS requiring long-term treatment with NSAIDs. One age-and sex-matched study of AS reported that the group that used NSAIDs for more than 48 months had a lower rate of kidney dysfunction than those who took NSAIDs for less than 48 months [24]. The authors suggested that these results may be due to AS itself and not to NSAIDs induced nephropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study was insu cient to explain the safety of kidney function in patients with AS requiring long-term treatment with NSAIDs. One age-and sex-matched study of AS reported that the group that used NSAIDs for more than 48 months had a lower rate of kidney dysfunction than those who took NSAIDs for less than 48 months [24]. The authors suggested that these results may be due to AS itself and not to NSAIDs induced nephropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study was insufficient to explain the safety of kidney function in patients with AS requiring longterm treatment with NSAIDs. One age-and sex-matched study of AS reported that the group that used NSAIDs for more than 48 months had a lower rate of kidney dysfunction than those who took NSAIDs for less than 48 months [24]. The authors suggested that these results may be due to AS itself and not to NSAIDs induced nephropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Chinese retrospective study, Wu, et al defined decreased renal function as an eGFR level lower than 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 with a prevalence of 0.1% (Wu et al, 2018). In contrast, an eGFR level lower than 90 ml/min/1.73 m 2 was regarded as a reduced eGFR in a hospital-based Indian study, and the prevalence, 37.5%, was much higher (Saigal et al, 2017). The lower prevalence of a decreased eGFR (0.3%) in our study might be due to the relatively strict definition used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%