2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000056611.92730.7b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal mRNA Levels as Prognostic Tools in Kidney Diseases

Abstract: Abstract. Molecular biologic techniques are currently considered as new diagnostic and prognostic parameters with a sensitivity and specificity exceeding those of histologic and functional data currently used in clinical practice. The results in various clinical settings have been of limited value up to now. This study is an investigation of the use of tissue levels of RNA determined in routine clinical kidney biopsies as prognostic tools. The focus was on RNA encoding for molecules known to be involved in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the high number of published references on single gene analysis and chronic allograft injury (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), mechanisms and predictors of progressive alloimmune scarring remain unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high number of published references on single gene analysis and chronic allograft injury (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), mechanisms and predictors of progressive alloimmune scarring remain unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of interstitial fibrosis was assessed in Sirius red-stained paraffin sections, according to methods that have been described elsewhere (19). The percentage of the Sirius red-positive area of the total tubulointerstitial surface was quantified by digital image analysis (20). Histology of all biopsies was evaluated according to Banff 1997 criteria (21).…”
Section: Assessment Of Morphologic Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been shown to be rapid and accurate in other clinical settings. 11,12 We therefore hypothesized that this technique may be an alternative way to diagnose preeclampsia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%