2019
DOI: 10.4155/fmc-2019-0152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renal Targeting Delivery Systems

Abstract: Despite much progress achieved in the SPs design, unexpectedly low targeting efficiency, retention and poor cell permeability are still the major obstacles in the development of SPs candidates "

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve targeted drug delivery for AKI, nanotechnology-based approaches have been developed and can be categorized into two types: passive targeting and active targeting. Passive targeting relies on the intrinsic physicochemical characteristics of nanomaterials, such as size and surface charge, to selectively accumulate in the kidneys. , In active targeting, nanoparticles are designed to include some specific assistant ligands that can help recognize and bind to certain receptors on the surface of particular cell types, so as to enhance the specific uptake. These delivery approaches minimize nonspecific uptake by organs, allowing for selective drug delivery to the inflammatory injury sites in the kidneys.…”
Section: Strategy To Enhance the Therapeutic Property Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve targeted drug delivery for AKI, nanotechnology-based approaches have been developed and can be categorized into two types: passive targeting and active targeting. Passive targeting relies on the intrinsic physicochemical characteristics of nanomaterials, such as size and surface charge, to selectively accumulate in the kidneys. , In active targeting, nanoparticles are designed to include some specific assistant ligands that can help recognize and bind to certain receptors on the surface of particular cell types, so as to enhance the specific uptake. These delivery approaches minimize nonspecific uptake by organs, allowing for selective drug delivery to the inflammatory injury sites in the kidneys.…”
Section: Strategy To Enhance the Therapeutic Property Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] Notably, rational design of nanoparticle size and charge can be leveraged to bypass certain physiological barriers and instruct nanoparticle accumulation into specific tissues like the lymph nodes. [60][61][62] As shown in Figure 3, nanocarriers designed for lymph node delivery must (1) avoid clearance from the bloodstream by the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), (2) extravasate out of fenestrated blood vessels, and (3) traverse the extracellular matrix of the interstitium. 63 Hence, a deep understanding of each of these physiological barriers and the size and charge constraints they place on nanoparticle design are critical to develop successful nanocarrier systems to the lymph nodes.…”
Section: Physiological Barriers To Lymph Node Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c-MYB regulates the processes of self-renewal and differentiation, preventing the differentiation of cells [5,37,72,[74][75][76]. On the other hand, surface markers specific to tumor stem cells have not been established in renal tumors; however, it has been proposed that CXCR4 is essential for the maintenance of renal tumor stem cells [77], and it could be a good candidate as a specific marker of tumor stem cells [78][79][80]. Taken together, the reduction in the expression of MYBBP1A induces the activation of c-MYB, which ultimately results in an increase in the tumor stem cell phenotype.…”
Section: Mybbp1a and Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%