K + during a NaHCO 3 infusion. As will be discussed below, we now know that there are 5 levels of severity of PHAII so that the response to PRAN may differ between individual cases. Given the hyperkalemia of these patients, one might have expected even a supranormal response to PRAN as seen below in the mouse model of PHAII.32 PRAN were used in 11 of the studies surveyed here and although some had a reduced kaliuretic response, in none was there a response greater than the normal controls. 3,5,[7][8][9][11][12][13]17,19,20 Therefore, given the hyperkalemia, these results indicate a mild degree of depression of ENaC function. This might have been expected to lead to a compensatory increase in activity of the major K + secretory mechanism, the renal outer medullary K + (ROMK) channels. 34,35 This might imply that ROMK also was not functioning normally (Figure, Theory 1).Another factor that could have suppressed the K + secretion, particularly ROMK, 31 was the acidosis, which is known to be because of hyperkalemia in PHAII. 5,7,11,12 If PHAII is reversed by drug treatment (thiazide) and the drug is stopped, the hyperkalemia returns in 10 days before a return of the acidosis at 17 days, 8 indicating the primacy of the hyperkalemia. If the ENaC is compromised to a degree, this period without acidosis would provide ROMK with a window of opportunity to control the rising plasma K + ; this clearly does not happen. DeFronzo et al 33 studied K + secretion in sickle cell disease that damages the renal papillae and the medulla. They found a negligible response in K + secretion to PRAN, yet hyperkalemia did not occur (average plasma K + , 3.78±0.01 mmol/L). This difference from PHAII might be explained by the fact that although ROMK shares the late DT, the connecting tubule and the collecting duct sites with ENaC, functioning isoforms ROMK 2 and 3 are present as well in the whole of the distal convoluted tubule (DCT). 34 Therefore, in sickle cell disease, these isoforms may have been intact in the DCT before the late DCT but perhaps not so in PHAII. PHAII and sickle cell disease cannot be compared pathologically, but these results reflect on the way the effects of PRAN are interpreted because they show that a negligible response in K + secretion to PRAN is not obligatorily associated with hyperkalemia in humans.Finally, Golbang et al 26 (see below) have described a father and son with PHAII caused by a mutant gene shown by genetic testing to inhibit ROMK substantially.The second view of the cause of hyperkalemia in PHAII is that a Cl -shunt may play a role 3 by increasing paracellular Cl -absorption in the early DT (Figure, Theory 2). Schambelan et al 3 in 1981 showed that with mineralocorticoid pretreatment, intravenous Na 2 SO 4 and NaHCO 3 could both invoke an increase in K + excretion in PHAII, but that intravenous sodium chloride (NaCl) was much less able to do so. They postulated that a Cl -shunt proximal to the ENaC would result in less Cl -delivery and thus less negativity at the ENaC, resulting in decreased K + sec...