2020
DOI: 10.29312/remexca.v11i2.1777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rendimiento y calidad del chile habanero en respuesta a la poda de conducción y régimen nutrimental

Abstract: El chile habanero (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) se produce tradicionalmente en suelo y a cielo abierto, por lo que información de su cultivo hidropónico en condiciones de invernadero es escasa, sobre todo en lo referente a la conducción de la planta y nutrición. Por tal motivo, en un invernadero del campo experimental de la Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, se llevó a cabo un experimento en sistema hidropónico con la finalidad de evaluar el crecimiento, rendimient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…increased the yield from 5.98 to 15.67 and from 5.15 to 15.67 t ha -1 in HS-52 and Centauro hybrids (Espinoza-Ahumada et al, 2019). In this study, C. chinense pruned plants at three stems increased its yield in fruit weight (25.8 %), g plant -1 (26.3 %) and t ha -1 (26.3 %), contrary to reported by Bartz et al (2017), López-Gómez et al (2020), and Vasquez-Velazquez et al (2022 in C. chinense. In this sense, the non-pruned plants achieved the bets yield (190.0 fruits plant -1 and 1220.0 g plant -1 ) in comparison to the pruned plants at three stems (35.0 fruits plant -1 and 313.0 g plan -1 , Bartz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Capsicum Chinense Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…increased the yield from 5.98 to 15.67 and from 5.15 to 15.67 t ha -1 in HS-52 and Centauro hybrids (Espinoza-Ahumada et al, 2019). In this study, C. chinense pruned plants at three stems increased its yield in fruit weight (25.8 %), g plant -1 (26.3 %) and t ha -1 (26.3 %), contrary to reported by Bartz et al (2017), López-Gómez et al (2020), and Vasquez-Velazquez et al (2022 in C. chinense. In this sense, the non-pruned plants achieved the bets yield (190.0 fruits plant -1 and 1220.0 g plant -1 ) in comparison to the pruned plants at three stems (35.0 fruits plant -1 and 313.0 g plan -1 , Bartz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Capsicum Chinense Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…In this sense, the non-pruned plants achieved the bets yield (190.0 fruits plant -1 and 1220.0 g plant -1 ) in comparison to the pruned plants at three stems (35.0 fruits plant -1 and 313.0 g plan -1 , Bartz et al, 2017). In other study by López-Gómez et al (2020) informed that the pruned plants at three stems achieved the lower (68.6 fruits plant -1 ) yield in comparison to unpruned plants (278.6 fruits plant -1 ). More recently, Vasquez-Velazquez et al (2022) reported that there were not significant differences in the yield of C. chinense plants pruned at two (148.03 fruits plant -1 and 1279.7 g plant -1 ), three (165.5 fruits plant -1 and 1357.0 g plant -1 ) and four stems (152.6 fruits plant -1 and 1293.0 g plant -1 ).…”
Section: Capsicum Chinense Yieldmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations