Renewable energy and energy autonomy: how Indigenous peoples in Canada are shaping an energy future

Abstract

In 2015, the Liberal Party of Canada formed a majority federal government on a platform that included prioritizing Nation-to-Nation relationships with Indigenous (First Nations, Inuit, and Métis) peoples in the country and re-asserting global leadership in climate change action by moving away from fossil-fuel based extraction and toward renewable energy initiatives. It may be argued that addressing both of these issues, advancing Indigenous–Settler reconciliation, and mitigating climate change, can be done in the same space. Indeed, though Indigenous peoples in Canada and elsewhere have recently moved forward with renewable energy initiatives within their Territories, there has been very little critical analysis on just how such projects have been operationalized and whether renewable energy can or even should be considered a vehicle for reconciliation efforts. In this paper, we present a systematic review of Canadian literature (spanning from 1980 to 2017) concerning Indigenous peoples’ involvement in renewable energy to better understand the stated motivations and desires of Indigenous peoples in Canada taking leadership, partnering in, and (or) participating in the renewable energy sector. Using a series of keyword search strings across three academic databases, two theses databases, and a grey literature search, we retrieved literature (n = 980) that was subjected to four exclusionary forms and then thematically analyzed the included literature (n = 26). Our findings suggest Indigenous peoples’ experiences and motivations are varied, yet many are developing renewable energy in their Territories to: break free of colonial ties, move towards energy autonomy, establish more reliable energy systems, and reap the long-term financial benefits that clean energy can provide. Despite the apparent advantages seen throughout most of the literature reviewed here, we suggest further research in this area is necessary before this kind of positive rhetoric of renewable energy in Indigenous communities builds enough momentum that proponents become blind to possible shortcomings. We conclude with a broader discussion of the interactions between Indigenous–Settler reconciliation in the context of renewable energy projects as well as offering indicators for future research to fill current knowledge gaps.

Scale, history and justice in community wind energy: An empirical review

“…Thus, as Ellis & Ferraro [22] remind, local acceptance is embedded within larger energy transition structureshence, the outer circle in Figure 3. For example, in the Canadian context, Stefanelli et al [83] write about the potential for community renewable energy to increase well-being in Indigenous communities. Yet, while their core explanatory concepts relate to historical contexte.g., post-colonial reconciliation and environmental repossession -such concepts may readily be mapped onto the other concepts in Figure 3: investment, procedural and benefits issues.…”

Implementing Indigenous Gender-Based Analysis in Research: Principles, Practices and Lessons Learned

“…A SHARED Future is a research program that brings forward stories of healing and reconciliation in the context of intersectoral partnerships associated with renewable energy transitions [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. This research program aims to contribute to a just praxis on the global energy transition now underway in the wake of the climate change crisis.…”

Rethinking democracy in times of crises: Towards a pragmatist approach to the geographies of emerging publics

“…At present, there exists a whole range of grassroots initiatives and newly emerging public spheres both inside and outside existing institutions that are paradigmatic for Dewey’s arguments: in the last years, affected people and communities in different parts of the world have been developing very diverse answers to climate change and forms on environmental injustice. These include for instance self-governed renewable energy projects of indigenous people in Canada (Stefanelli et al, 2018), resettlement strategies of environmental migrants in the Pacific region (Klepp and Herbeck, 2016), or the struggle for food sovereignty of peasant communities in the Global South (Fladvad et al, 2020). These movements and initiatives do not only claim more protection against the structures that harm them, as well as self-determination and participation in respective decision-making processes, they also collaboratively create new institutional designs and seek to realize their own legal strategies of dealing with climate change and/or environmental injustice.…”